Posted on 03/29/2011 11:28:07 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
Why does DSCA make aircraft prices so confusing?
By Stephen Trimble on March 29, 2011
The Indian press says New Delhi is holding up a blockbuster deal for 10 Boeing C-17s. There's apparently some concerns about the bill, which the US Defense Security and Cooperation Agency (DSCA) estimates could cost as much as $5.8 billion. Ouch! That's worth as much as $580 million per aircraft.
This raises one of my frequent gripes about DSCA's mandatory notifications to Congress. In short, they make no sense.
According to DSCA, the same aircraft with nearly identical equipment and extra features will result in a wild range of costs, depending on which country is buying. It's not unreasonable for some countries to think they're getting a bad deal if all they're reading are the DSCA notifications.
Consider four recent sales announcements by the DSCA. If you go by these numbers, Australia is buying its latest C-17 ($300 million) for nearly half the price of India's deal ($580 million each) despite ordering superior equipment, such as the large aircraft infrared countermeasures system (LAIRCM). Similarly, NATO is buying two C-17s for nearly the same price ($700 million) that Kuwait is buying only one ($693 million).
Biggest aircraft deal with US flies into air pocket after India questions price
http://www.indianexpress.com/story-print/767847/
Pakistan is able to buy the same quality F-16s for half the price that is quoted for India’s F-16IN for MMRCA. And they also get military aid.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.