A) It’s natural and commendable for a man to have several mates.
B) The only punishment for an unmaried woman who has sex with a man—be it with a man married to another woman or not—should be social censure, and also she should have no claim on the man for the support of herself and of any resulting children.
To do otherwise, is to dilute the institution of marriage and nullify the the true foundation for legal marriage: which is to make the man legally responsible for the support of his wife and any children she bears (unless he can prove those children the result of her adultery).
But since it’s now OK for sex outside of marriage, and since it’s now OK for women to get palimony, who needs marriage any more?
And if marriage isn’t for support of the weaker sex and her children, might as well marry men to men and women to women.
Or better, just eliminate marriage altogether instead of continuing to prop up what has become a sham.
“It’s natural and commendable for a man to have several mates.”
Really? Men who are faithful to their wives are not natural or commendable? I’ve been saving myself for 33 years for such an “unnatural” man.