Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Brian Aitken’s Mistake - An outrageous gun prosecution in New Jersey
Reason ^ | March 2011 | Radley Balko

Posted on 03/28/2011 4:46:25 PM PDT by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

1 posted on 03/28/2011 4:46:32 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Coleus; jocon307; Alberta's Child; Pharmboy; Calpernia; Malsua; dead; nj26; OldFriend; Clemenza; ...
BANG!
2 posted on 03/28/2011 4:50:37 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Prosecutors only care about one thing: obtaining a conviction. They would sell their own children down the river if it put another notch in the win column.


3 posted on 03/28/2011 4:56:42 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; Joe Brower
Bump
Ping
4 posted on 03/28/2011 4:59:18 PM PDT by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Jury nullification was in order.


5 posted on 03/28/2011 4:59:57 PM PDT by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Zoo Jersey should be expelled from the USA


6 posted on 03/28/2011 5:03:14 PM PDT by Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I’d be hard pressed to speak to either the mother ever again.


7 posted on 03/28/2011 5:05:53 PM PDT by Jonty30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
There’s a happy ending: On December 20, Gov. Christie commuted Aitken’s sentence. Aitken came home on December 23rd. His felony conviction still stands, but he will fight to clear his record through the appeals process.
No. A happy ending would be
1. A pardon or retrial where he is cleared.
2. Prosecutors sued and losing their jobs for prosecutorial misconduct.
3. Some punishment for the lying judge.
4. New Jersey's laws changed.

Aitken remains a criminal thanks to the trial, and Crhistie remains a Rino blowhard.

8 posted on 03/28/2011 5:09:59 PM PDT by rmlew (You want change? Vote for the most conservative electable in your state or district.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
It might even make some New Jersey gun owners wonder if they have more to fear from the state’s ridiculous laws and overly aggressive cops and prosecutors than they do from criminals. Given what happened to Aitken, those fears wouldn’t be unfounded.

In this day and age of "Nifonging" prosecutors and militarized police agencies, law abiding citizens have WAY more to fear from government and "law enforcement" than criminals do.

9 posted on 03/28/2011 5:10:01 PM PDT by spodefly (This is my tag line. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Why does Christie get a pass because he commuted the sentence when a full pardon was in order?


10 posted on 03/28/2011 5:10:49 PM PDT by st.eqed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
FTA: Sue Aitken called the police because she was worried about her son Brian. She now lives with the guilt of knowing her phone call is the reason Brian wound up sitting in a New Jersey prison.

I feel for the mother; she clearly didn't plan to cause harm to her son.

But the fact is that anyone in New Jersey who wishes to do harm to another person has an easy path to take due to these laws.

Law abiding citizens in New Jersey ought to be very concerned about this and should do something before they find themselves caught up in the labyrinthine mess that constitutes Garden State gun regulations.

11 posted on 03/28/2011 5:14:46 PM PDT by mountainbunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rmlew

To me the single most important fact is that HE ASKED THE POLICE FOR INSTRUCTIONS AND FOLLOWED THEM~!!

Everything else is less important that that. If you can go to jail for doing what the police tell you to do, then this system needs armed insurrection.

And the judge refused to let the jury know? They turned a concientious law-abiding citizen into a criminal for political gain.

JAIL FOR THEM ALL - he was Nifong’ed.

I hope he sues their asses for several million dollars. And I hate lawsuits.


12 posted on 03/28/2011 5:27:26 PM PDT by Mr. K (Job #1 DEFUND THE LEFT then Palin/Bachman 2012 -Unbeatable Ticket~!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jewbacca

“Jury nullification was in order.”

I wonder if it would be possible to set up a system to educate potential jurors in jury nullification.


13 posted on 03/28/2011 5:28:12 PM PDT by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

And some can’t understand why so many of us despise the pigs.


14 posted on 03/28/2011 5:34:37 PM PDT by Slump Tester (What if I'm pregnant Teddy? Errr-ahh -Calm down Mary Jo, we'll cross that bridge when we come to it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rmlew

The taxpayers of N.J. don’t mind feeding and housing an innocent man for 7 years, not a bit,,,,,ya hear, not a bit. Ya got that??


15 posted on 03/28/2011 5:35:21 PM PDT by Waco (From Seward to Sara)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

“Putting Brian Aitken in prison wouldn’t have made New Jersey any safer.”

And given demographic realities, the more NJ gun owners who move out of the state, the less safe those who are left will be. The ultimate aim of the anti-gunners in NJ is a state where gun ownership is outlawed. It will become like Chicago, where the rate of firearm-related crime is high. But the clueless liberals who banned guns to be safer will never think that they were wrong. In my opinion these people have blood on their hands.


16 posted on 03/28/2011 5:40:04 PM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dsc
I wonder if it would be possible to set up a system to educate potential jurors in jury nullification.

Not under the current system of selection of jurors. Both lawyers will reject you if you claim to know anything about this subject. There will be always plenty of low IQ candidates from which to select. Why not if they are "educating" them in public schools.

If an activist tries to educate jurors within the court building s/he may be arrested for "interfering" with them. Judges know more laws than a normal person does, and they can apply them on the spot. If some laws are unconstitutional ... the activist will be free to challenge them from behind the bars.

The reason is that the bosses of the current system of [in]justice want it this way, and they have all the power to enforce their preferences. Today the justice system is a world in itself, with its own High Priests, soldiers, and other servants. They have their own language, their own power, their own "sacred books," and they can imprison anyone at will - just as it happened in this story.

17 posted on 03/28/2011 5:51:30 PM PDT by Greysard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Greysard

Getting the issue to go viral at a grass roots level will be the only thing that helps.


18 posted on 03/28/2011 5:55:30 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Hawk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Greysard

“Both lawyers will reject you if you claim to know anything about this subject.”

And I’m guessing that responses during voir dire are given under oath, so that anyone claiming no knowledge could be prosecuted for perjury.


19 posted on 03/28/2011 6:06:01 PM PDT by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: dsc

>>“Both lawyers will reject you if you claim to know anything about this subject.”
>
>And I’m guessing that responses during voir dire are given under oath, so that anyone claiming no knowledge could be prosecuted for perjury.

Perhaps; though I don’t think they ask directly about Jury Nullification: their greatest advantage is that [most] people do not know about it.


20 posted on 03/28/2011 6:21:32 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson