Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard

One must keep in mind that the last eight to ten years have seen the development of digital cameras. Phone cameras, pocket cameras, etc.

In the past, war were fought in areas that were not conducive to the retention and development of film.

In addition, digital technology makes low light and lousy light photos much easier.

One has to wonder what GI photos would have come out of the jungles of WWII and VN had they had the digital technology.

And since most of these men and women are really just kids, without our years of wisdom (and having seen our share of people self destruct doing stupid things) I would expect them to take pictures of everything, and post them on facebook.

Not trying to excuse this, but explain why you see it now—and why it is more shocking that it had been int the past.


50 posted on 03/28/2011 4:40:47 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (How long before the Mall becomes Tahifir Sq?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: Vermont Lt

You’re right, of course. Also, FDR kept a tight leash on the media back then. There were no reports of rapes or war crimes in the papers or on the evening news.

But I do think these images will create an emotional reaction, causing the average Oprah-watching soccer mom to take the “Support Our Troops” magnet off the SUV and demand the troops come home. Especially when Afghanistan is engulfed in riots.


52 posted on 03/28/2011 6:08:22 PM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (Some men just want to watch the world burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson