Posted on 03/25/2011 3:06:19 PM PDT by Daus
By Jason Stein of the Journal Sentinel
Madison - A controversial bill limiting collective bargaining for public workers has been officially published despite a temporary restraining order barring its publication.
The legislation was published Friday with a footnote that notes the restraining order, but says the law "requires the Legislative Reference Bureau to publish every act within 10 working days after its date of enactment."
The publication of the law means that it will take effect Saturday.
The restraining order was issued against Secretary of State Doug La Follette, not the reference bureau. La Follette is a Democrat and the Legislature is run by Republicans, but the reference bureau is a nonpartisan agency widely respected by both sides.
La Follettte and aides to Gov. Scott Walker and legislative leaders could not be immediately released.
The publication of the law came the same day a third court action was filed challenging Walker's budget-repair law that sharply curtails union bargaining by public employees.
Friday, city of Madison firefighters and public works employees filed suit in Dane County Circuit Court against Walker and the state seeking to block the law from taking effect, saying it had been passed in violation of the state constitution.
The Madison workers are using somewhat different arguments than those in other lawsuits, saying that the law treats some union workers unfairly compared to other workers. The law also violates constitutional provisions requiring that three-fifths of lawmakers be present to vote on certain financial bills, the lawsuit said.
"These provisions treat those employees who are represented by public-sector labor organizations in ways that are different in significant respects from the ways in which they treat employees who are not represented by any labor organization," the lawsuit reads.
The named plaintiff in the lawsuit is Jamie O'Brien, a public works employee who lives in Madison.
A spokesman for Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen declined to comment on the lawsuit. It followed other court actions brought against the law by Dane County Executive Kathleen Falk and other county officials and a separate case brought by Dane County District Attorney Ismael Ozanne.
Last week, a Dane County judge temporarily blocked the law from taking effect while she hears the case brought by Ozanne. In that case, Ozanne argues that GOP lawmakers violated the state open meetings law when a committee passed the measure without adequate public notice - a contention that Republicans deny.
Those cases are ongoing and the state's appeal of the judge's temporary restraining order is currently before the state Supreme Court, which has not said whether it would take up the matter.
The budget-repair measure was meant to shore up the state's finances through June 30 but drew massive protests because of the collective bargaining changes. It stalled when Senate Democrats left the state Feb. 17 to block action on the measure. The state constitution requires 20 of 33 senators - three-fifths of the body - to be present to vote on bills with certain fiscal elements, and Republicans hold just 19 seats.
After three weeks, Republicans quickly convened a conference committee March 9 to strip appropriations out of the bill. They said the changes to the bill meant they no longer needed 20 senators to be present.
The four Republicans on the conference committee voted for the bill as they ignored shouts by the lone Democrat at the meeting, Assembly Minority Leader Peter Barca of Kenosha, that they were violating the open meetings law. The Senate passed it minutes later with no Democrats present as protesters jammed the halls of the Capitol.
Other provisions with financial impacts for the state, such as requirements that state employees pay more for their health and pension benefits, remained in the bill. Those provisions should have also required a vote by 20 senators, the lawsuit filed Friday argued. Republicans have also denied that claim.
The constitution requires the three-fifths majority for "any law which imposes, continues or renews a tax, or creates a debt or charge, or makes, continues or renews an appropriation of public or trust money, or releases, discharges or commutes a claim or demand of the state."
Barry would publish it. Rulings by dumbass “judges” don’t mean anything to him and his commie ‘RATS. Publish the bill!!!!!
Ain’t that just half-a-bitch. LOL
Wow! That’s awesome!
[The Madison workers are using somewhat different arguments than those in other lawsuits, saying that the law treats some union workers unfairly compared to other workers]
Oh that’s rich. They should pass the law again and include firefighters and police!
I am loving this. What will Shirley do next?
Release from what?
LOVE it!! bttt
Those who live by the letter of the law die by the letter of the law.
Amazing - the libs got a TRO against the Secretary of State, but the power of publishing and finalizing law lies with the Legislative Reference Bureau - an independent nonpartisan law agency.
Now we know why the Republicans didn’t worry about the TRO and didn’t reconvene to “revote” the bill.
Done deal. Bubye to the unions.
LOL! An amazing governor and Republican legislature.
Made my day.
Furthermonre, Gov. Walker has promised that a bill containing the fiscal aspects of the Budget Repair Bill that were removed thanks to the Fleebaggers will be introduced on Monday and four public hearings have been scheduled around the state.
Business moves on even as the unionistas deny and whine.
That’s what I just said to my husband two minutes ago as I read the article aloud to him, lol!
Wise minds, etc.!
Yeah, I wondered if maybe there was a flaw in the suit or the order that would explain why the pubs were seemingly unconcerned about the TRO against La Follette.
Hey the way I see it is they can dish it ourt but can’t take it. Do they remember how the Healthcare law was passed by the Dems? It was A LOT less constitutional than this one could ever be. Where were the unions on that?
I’m back with Walker with the exception of one real item. He should have included the police and firefighters. Why this elite class of employees which are paid above the average workers in private industry is beyond me.
Are the rats still hiding? If not, then just have another vote with the whole budget included. If they are still hiding then pass the bill with notice. Problem solved.
I’m sure they would still sue over something though.
This reference to the "open meetings law" has made no sense from the beginning. The legislature is, and has been from the beginning, in open session. The Dems are trying to say the committee meeting required a special "notice" of its own, but that's nonsense - such meetings are a regular part of regular legislative sessions. That whole argument is a lie.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.