Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GonzoGOP
350 C is only 662 F. That seems to be very low for a stainless steel structure. You could barely melt lead (327 C) at those temperatures. Stainless Steel shouldn't melt until over 1500 C. Is there something else going on here or do they just have a massive safety factor built into their warranties.

It's the concern over the fuel rods themselves that are of concern. If the reactor vessel is 300 C, then the fuel within is certainly hotter. The heat, as I understand it, damages and can break down the plating on the rods in such a way that at some point, a nuclear reaction can occur which would produce an enormous amount of heat.

The idea is to cool the fuel down to prevent it from going "critical".

Ideally, the entire fuel assembly should be covered with water (normally, circulating through a heat exchanger of some sort as part of its circulation, to remove excess heat). They're trying to achieve that with sea water, and they're adding boron or boric acid (not sure which) to further reduce and block neutron flow so that the fuel is much less likely to go critical.

38 posted on 03/23/2011 1:54:43 PM PDT by meyer (We will not sit down and shut up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: meyer

First off, don’t use the word “critical” when speaking of reactors unless you know what it means. The definition of critical is “the same number of neutrons were born in this generation as were born in the previous generation.”

Translation: reactor power is stable

FYI subcritical means reactor power is decreasing and supercritical means reactor power is increasing.

All of the reactors at Fukushima are subcritical. The heat created in a shutdown reactor is not from fission of the fuel, but decay of the fission products.

Second, the breakdown of the cladding at high temperatures is not a nuclear reaction; it’s a chemical reaction between the zirconium and water. It produces zirconium dioxide and hydrogen gas.

I forget what temperature that happens since I’ve never melted a core much less created a water-metal reaction in a reactor.

The danger of this reaction is not the heat, but the pressure and explosive gas created.

Third, water moderated reactors such as these GE BWRs have a negative temperature coefficient of reactivity. Cooling the reactor with water will *help* the reactor go critical, not prevent it.

Cooler water —> denser water —> more effective at “slowing down” neutrons from “fast” to “thermal” —> more likely U-235 and Pu-239 to absorb neutron and fission

You are correct about boron. It’s one of the best neutron sponges out there. (Hafnium and xenon are other notables)


181 posted on 03/23/2011 6:13:24 PM PDT by OA5599
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson