Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blackdog
That's unusual for that engine isn't it? Except for one series with camshaft issues, I believe it has a great history of reliability.
212 posted on 03/23/2011 8:03:45 PM PDT by Errant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies ]


To: Errant
I bought the plane after a flight school went out of business. It had over 9000 hours tt airframe and 455 SMOH. It sure was a great time builder for very little cost. Full IFR, and it was the last year they made the Cruiser(1977)

There wasn't a trip I made where some pilot wouldn't come running up and asking about the plane, retelling their first lessons in it. On the flip side there wasn't a controller or tower on the east coast that didn't throw darts at that tail number until they got used to me.

I caused the cracks. I used to go in and out of class B airports that would only deal with 90 knots on the glideslope. Shock cooling was hard on the engine. It was pretty funny on finals when on the left was a 737 and on the right side was a cherokee on the same approach and speed. I could stick it down at 75KTS and make the first high speed turnoff. I worked at Charlotte Int'l. I would fly to and from work. I'd depart in 1000 feet, bank a hard turnout and be gone from their departures in a heartbeat. Good o'l days!

I've gotta do a new panel in it now to be legal and don't have the money until my middle daughter finishes college.

216 posted on 03/23/2011 8:23:26 PM PDT by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies ]

To: Errant

Tha camshaft AD you are refering to is one type of a hollow camshaft they used. Fortunately I did not have it.


218 posted on 03/23/2011 8:27:45 PM PDT by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson