[Wonder Warthog]

"So I'm curious as to how far you would carry this? Do you have the right to carry your weapon into someone's house? Obviously I would disagree."

I don't see why this is so difficult for you. We're talking BUSINESS property, not somebody's home. The cases are completely different. The rights exercisable by/on business properties are less than for "real" private property (i.e. the "castle" in "a man's home is his castle"). During the integration/desegregation/civil rights timeframe, the courts decided that business owners had no right to exclude blacks from their BUSINESS properties.

[triumphant values]

We're talking BUSINESS property, not somebody's home.

We're talking private property, period. The concept that someone can't set the condition of not being armed to enter their private property is so absurd, I'm amazed this is even a point of contention on this forum.