[fabrizio]

what a lowlife. I hope ALL pro-lifers and conservatives in Massachussets and not just loyal Catholics will call the office of this weasel and vote him out of office the next time around

[grumpygresh]

It’s really useless to fret over a rino like Scott Brown. Just as it is useless to fret over Leftist states like MA. Conservatives should ignore him and concentrate on getting conservative Republicans elected in conservative states.

[freekitty]

What a POS.

[funfan]

Baby Killer-he should be so proud and his daughters should consider themselves lucky they could have been just another statistic

[ScottinVA]

So he`s pro-death, too. What again was the last conservative stand he made?

[rintense]

Shocked I tell you. Shocked.

[roamer_1]

Rue the day... Did I say that way back when? Yes, I did.

Principles, principles, principles.

[TribalPrincess2U]

Digging the grave a little deeper, huh azzwad?

[TexasFreeper2009]

if we can't even cut federal funding for abortion... there is NO hope of ever cutting the deficit, ever.

[Jim Noble]

Scott Brown was elected by independent (unenrolled) women.

Abortion is their sacrament.

He's going to be reelected (overwhelmingly) next year - but not if he turns against abortion.

[SeekAndFind]

Let’s look at it this way — in Massachusetts, you only have choices between two evils — the GREATER (Martha Coakley) and the LESSER ( Scott Brown ).

Brown promised to oppose Obamacare and that was THE ISSUE during the elections then. If you can find someone else more conservative than Brown in Mass, more power to you. I’ll support him/her over Brown.

Had Coakley won, we’d have government funding of Planned Parenthood AND Obamacare.

There are no good choices in that state as far as I can see. If Mitt Romney is the best we can get out of it, the state is a lost cause.

[Retired Greyhound]

For some reason I'm not surprised by anything this attention whore does.

[JPG]

Killing babies is family planning? Sen Brown, with all due respect, you suck.

[WhistlingPastTheGraveyard]

To the surprise of no one paying attention. The guy had that “special kind of scumbag” vibe from day one.

But at least he stopped the health care bill. Oh wait...

[GOPsterinMA]

OK, all you Snot Brown-stain apologists, tell me again how he’s SO MUCH BETTER than Marcia Coakley.

Actually, don’t bother, because my replies will be XXX rated.

[fwdude]

Ted Kennedy, is that you?

(Might as well be.)

[NFHale]

Looks like he turned out to be a real liberal RINO POS.

Lot of Freepers said he would be...

[Jim Scott]

Abortion-on-demand subsidized by 'government' (tax) money to give infanticide the patina of legitimacy is sacrosanct to liberals and nowhere more than in very liberal Massachusetts. Like many conservatives, I'm disappointed by Scott Brown generally and especially by his position on federal funding for abortion. I don't know how such politicians can sleep at night, knowing that, by their vote, they are abetting infanticide. However, Senator Brown obviously feels he is doing the will of the people who elected him and feels quite justified in his stand although his weasel words on the issue that carefully avoid the word 'abortion' belie his supposed conviction. No, I wouldn't vote for him, either.

I live in neighboring Connecticut, just about as politically liberal as Massachusetts and a state that, until recently, boasted both Chris Dodd and Joe Lieberman as our senators, which tells you how liberal the 'Nutmeg state' really is. In Connecticut, abortion-on-demand is also viewed as a sacred right of all women and no politician that ever expects to actually win an election in this state would dare vote against federal funding for Planned Parenthood's abortion mills. Those charnel houses are like churches to the leftists. A principled Republican politician wouldn't do what Scott Brown is doing, but then, how many principled politicians do we have in the Republican party? Besides, it's painfully obvious that Scott Brown likes his job and wants to keep it so, as far as he is concerned, conservatives can just suck it up if they want a senator with an 'R' after his name to represent Massachusetts in the U.S. senate. There you have it.

[ROTB]

“Why can’t he run as a Democrat??” (C)(TM)

[ICE-FLYER]

Mass is one of those places where the leftist marxists of our nation have a strong presence at the polls. What is at issue is not that they are there in numbers but that they represent only a percentage that creates the image of overwhelming support for the left. If the right minded people in Massachusetts actually got off their tails int he numbers that they exist in they would erase this issue and the Scott Browns would do what THEY say and NOT what the left says under the false assumption that it would mean re-election.

Massacusyesst CAN be turned around...hte communist left just wants the impression to remain that it can’t be done.