[gjones77]

You miss the point I was making, I didn’t say you supported Obama, I said you sound like one of his supporters did during the 2008 campaign with regards to Palin.

That’s my whole point, none of you seem to look at her subjectively, yes I agree with allot of her positions, that doesn’t mean she’s the second coming of Reagan, because she sure as hell isn’t.

And as for cult, yes, many of you sound like cult members, refusing to see anything negative about her and defending her to the bitter end no matter what facts are presented.

[alarm rider]

Points taken, although I do not agree with most of them. I see negatives in every candidate, I see less in Mrs. Palin, but to be sure she is a human and is flawed as are we all.

My point was simply that if it bothers you so much, find a new interest.

There are no “cults”, there are active supporters and passive supporters. I don’t know who you support, but I’ll bet I could present facts that you might take issue with.

I think at this point that she might run, and she might win. I don’t know, all I know is that she is a Bently in a parking lot full of Yugo’s.

[nhwingut]

many of you sound like cult members, refusing to see anything negative about her and defending her to the bitter end no matter what facts are presented.

Who is your candidate, again? It must be nice to just criticize without having to defend.

Imagine if you publicly stated whom you were backing. Then all your Palin criticism could be matched against your preferred candidate.

It's called compare and contrast. All you're doing now is drive-by trashing.