So, you've decided to change tactics, since you can't browbeat me with the LOST letter? I have posted a vanity on the latter, asking for help from FReepers who are experts in international law and treaties. We will find out.
And no, Sarah Palin is not an oathbreaker. She is not saying that states accord rights. It is disingenuous for you to suggest that.
There's nothing else to say about it. She supports it. Conservatives, in other words those who care about our national sovereignty, don't.
How so? To say that this is "up to the states" is to say that if they so choose they can allow abortion. That means the most important right of all is alienable, not unalienable.
And it's a violation of explicit imperative constitutional requirements as well.
"No person shall be deprived of life without due process of law.""No State shall deprive any person of life without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
Her position is also in direct conflict with her own party's platform, which has contained the Reagan pro-life plank since 1984, which recognizes the personhood of unborn children and their protection by the Fourteenth Amendment.