The leap made by most posters here is truly unfortunate.
This is not about the false premise of 'gay' beings that possess some immutable characteristic defining them as a different 'gay' species. There is no scientific basis for your premise. Your argument is a red herring.
Blood and organ donations should be legitimately discriminated against based upon ACTIVITY as well as testing.
In this case we see the results of buying into the politically correct BS you seem to subscribe to; e.g. "a jerk who appears/happens to be gay" versus the reality of a disordered individual who chooses to engage in unhealthy actions...
“Blood and organ donations should be legitimately discriminated against based upon ACTIVITY as well as testing.”
Please go back and read what I have written. I make precisely that point. Indeed, that is precisely my point. It is the wrecklessness of the activity that warrants the restriction, not the gayness of the perpetrator.
I am not against the restriction. I am not in favor of wrecklessness. You have simply chosen to misread what I have put forward.
I sense a growing online committee of people who want me banned. So ... I’m more than happy to have Jim Robinson weigh in, if he wants.