Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Japan Nuclear Agency: Pressure Inside No. 3 Reactor Containment Vessel Rising(to vent steam?)
Nikkei ^ | 03/20/11

Posted on 03/19/2011 10:46:04 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

Sunday, March 20, 2011

Japan Nuclear Agency: Pressure Inside No. 3 Reactor Containment Vessel Rising

TOKYO (Dow Jones)--Japan's nuclear safety agency said Sunday that pressure levels are rising inside the containment vessel at reactor No. 3 at the stricken Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant.

The Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency said at a press conference that plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Co. (9501) will open valves at the reactor in a bid to reduce pressure levels, an operation that it said could result in the release of radioactive steam.

If a mechanism at the reactor know as the suppression chamber---which is designed to help curb pressure within the containment vessel by cooling down steam inside it---doesn't work well, Tepco may let steam out directly from the vessel in an operation officials call "dry ventilation." The amount of radioactive material in any released steam would increase in that case, the agency said.

(Excerpt) Read more at e.nikkei.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Japan; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fukushima; no3reactor; radioactivesteam

1 posted on 03/19/2011 10:46:12 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; sushiman; Ronin; AmericanInTokyo; gaijin; struggle; DTogo; GATOR NAVY; Iris7; ...

P!


2 posted on 03/19/2011 10:47:06 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (The way to crush the bourgeois is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

They have been doing very dangerous work and I wish them the best of luck and a safe ending to this.


3 posted on 03/19/2011 10:59:00 PM PDT by Cheetahcat ( November 4 2008 ,A date which will live in Infamy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

If the pressure is rising that means the containment vessel has not been breached ..a good sign


4 posted on 03/19/2011 11:58:51 PM PDT by montanajoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montanajoe

Perhaps. It could also mean it is producing more steam than the size of a breach can released, if there is a breach.

I think the only partial conclusion that can be drawn is it is getting hotter.


5 posted on 03/20/2011 12:22:47 AM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
does Tepco think that any of these reactors are salvageable? why are they still using water? how long can firetrunks with pumps designed for pure freshwater continue to pump seawater without corroding or gunking up with sea minerals, sand and fishparts? and when the pumps seize up, what then?

when is it time to call it a day and build a concrete mountain?

6 posted on 03/20/2011 12:58:06 AM PDT by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueplum
I think they want to restore electricity to cooling system. While they are at it, they try to cool reactors with seawater. However, it apparently takes time. Evaporating water due to reactor heat create steam which builds up inside reactor building before cooling system even get its power back. It just goes back and forth: letting steam out and step back until radioactive steam dissipates; then come back to resume the work of restoring power to cooling system.

I think they still have more high pressure water truck to expend. With U.S. actively joining the efforts,I hope they can get a better handle on this.

7 posted on 03/20/2011 1:29:23 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (The way to crush the bourgeois is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

You would hope they can cool the whole operation before they decide what to do next. Every time they release pressure another explosion is possible besides more contamination going airborne.


8 posted on 03/20/2011 1:51:31 AM PDT by Razzz42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

It seems to me that the first thing to have done would have been to helicopter in a few caterpiler semi trailer sized power plants and fuel with some wire. Cut and tap into the power system at the nuke plants to get the pumps running and any other equipment that needed power. Next would be to have helicoptered in a bunch of pipe and big water pumps to get water from the sea up to the coolant pools and then pumped water into the plant from there or to pumps that could shoot the now near endless supply of seawater onto the exposed cores to cool them down. Course I’m just armchairing and wasn’t there to see the on site challenges. I hope there will be a thick how to manuel for the next time this happens as a result of this.


9 posted on 03/20/2011 2:43:59 AM PDT by Freeper Fanatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freeper Fanatic

This is cheesy but I went to a Japanese sushi place today. Part of the reason was to give moral support. after I ate my octopus and salmon roe, I drank some sake, not salmon - the wine. Anyway, I drank three sake and then I took my check. When I was ready to leave I said, “I would like to say, I hope your family is doing okay.” She said that no one working there has family in Japan. I felt a little cheesy, but that is okay.


10 posted on 03/20/2011 4:04:18 AM PDT by Sarah-bot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: blueplum
"when is it time to call it a day and build a concrete mountain?"

Get a hold on yourself. The reactors have been shut down since the earthquake. The only issue in the reactors is residual heat, which is dissipating. The problem at the sites is stored spent fuel rods, not the reactors. They need water, not mountains.

The timeline is this:
Earthquake hits
Reactors shut down
Emergency generators start up to pump water
Tsunami destroys generators
Water stops, things get hotter
sea water is introduced to stabilize cooling
Power line installed
Water pumps are now being restarted

11 posted on 03/20/2011 5:48:27 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Galileo: In science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of one individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sarah-bot
This is cheesy but I went to a Japanese sushi place today. Part of the reason was to give moral support. after I ate my octopus and salmon roe, I drank some sake, not salmon - the wine. Anyway, I drank three sake and then I took my check. When I was ready to leave I said, “I would like to say, I hope your family is doing okay.” She said that no one working there has family in Japan. I felt a little cheesy, but that is okay.

Please don't feel bad. Very, very few "Japanese" restaurants in the U.S. are anything of the sort. Almost all "Japanese restaurants" in the U.S. are owned by Chinese or Koreans who have never been to Japan and have never eaten real Japanese food.

The Japanese government has actually tried to encourage these folks to at least get some training in Japanese cuisine and actually use Japanese ingredients in their "Japanese food", but virtually none have responded.

The MAFF set up a webpage here, and issued an advisory report.

From the report:

We are excited at the prospect of more people coming to enjoy Japanese cuisine and the spread of traditional Japanese ingredients around the world as the number of Japanese restaurants increases, and this is the time to accelerate and to evolve this movement. However at present the number of restaurants is rapidly increasing despite a lack of information concerning Japanese food and without the provision of ingredients that not only characterize, but are essential to Japanese cuisine. As a result, there is a concern that the good reputation of Japanese cuisine could be damaged.

[ ... ]

  • Among these Japanese restaurants, although the menu and other aspects vary from restaurant to restaurant, there are some that operate under the guise of a Japanese restaurant just because of the up-market image that is associated with Japanese food.
  • There are restaurants that are using ingredients that are not suited to Japanese cuisine, or there is simply not enough range or quantity of ingredients suited to Japanese food being provided to cope with the rapidly increasing number of restaurants.
  • Fish and shellfish are often eaten raw in Japanese restaurants, but in places where it is not customary to eat raw fish, the knowledge or skills required for handling, processing and consuming fresh fish are often lacking. The possibility of an incident as a result of such shortcomings has the potential to damage the image of Japanese food.
  • The rapid increase of Japanese restaurants has lead to a shortage of professionals who are skilled in and have a detailed knowledge of Japanese food, particularly in overseas countries. It has also been strongly suggested that it is necessary to spread these skills and knowledge.
  • In addition to the above points, there is a lack of information concerning Japanese cuisine being transmitted overseas. For this reason, it is necessary to provide such information through Japanese restaurants and provide Japanese restaurants outside Japan with information in order to make this possible.

If you do manage to find a restaurant owned by a Japanese chef, treasure it! It's very rare.

12 posted on 03/20/2011 7:06:57 AM PDT by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sarah-bot
Sarah-bot wrote: This is cheesy but I went to a Japanese sushi place today. Part of the reason was to give moral support. after I ate my octopus and salmon roe, I drank some sake, not salmon - the wine. Anyway, I drank three sake and then I took my check. When I was ready to leave I said, “I would like to say, I hope your family is doing okay.” She said that no one working there has family in Japan. I felt a little cheesy, but that is okay.

Perhaps the road to embarassment is paved with good intentions too. If nothing else, I hope you had a decent meal. I'm sure I've committed your equal in the past. It's good for a laugh to look back on.
13 posted on 03/20/2011 4:45:09 PM PDT by Freeper Fanatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: norwaypinesavage

well, my FRiend, the teensy tiny problem with water is, once it’s carrying radioactivity, how the hell do you get rid of it? how much more water do you want to pour on this mess, which will never be an operational site again because of radioactive contamination?

and btw, where are you going to put that water? what containment is in place? besides seeping into the existing water table where it shows up in municipal water (bingo), or seeping into existing water treatment facilities from people showering themselves and their vegetables (double bingo), or discharging the runoff into the ocean in the hopeie/changie dream that it will ‘degrade’ (announced on CNN today= grand prize, com’n down!) WHAT are you going tyo do with that water on an island? More water is insane.

Concrete the blasted thing, blast and dig up half the California desert boron to do it if you have to, but get it done, and be done with it.


14 posted on 03/22/2011 1:28:04 AM PDT by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: blueplum
Pure water isn't radioactive. It can be filtered and/or treated to remove whatever it is carrying, if anything. You need to review the physics of this situation. Once a high energy atomic particle is stopped, it is no longer "radioactive". Water that is used as a radioactivity shield doesn't necessarily become radioactive itself.

The reactors themselves have been shut down since the earthquake. The only issue with them is residual activity. The recent problems have been with the spent fuel ponds, and they don't create abnormal radioactivity as long as they are kept cool. This is NOT the end of the world.

15 posted on 03/22/2011 6:49:46 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Galileo: In science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of one individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: blueplum
Units 5 and 6 were undamaged. Those will likely be restarted. Unit 4 had a problem with overheating of the SFP. The reactor itself may be okay, they need to get in there and look it over once the SFP situation is dealt with. Units 2 and 3 had core damage and will have to undergo some decon before they can assess whether or not those can be restarted. Unit 1 is the oldest and had core damage so they are probably looking at a TMI-2 kind of D&D operation for that one.

The use of seawater in and of itself, contrary to what has been put out in the popular media, is not necessarily a deal-breaker. Saltwater corrosion takes place over a long time period in materials that are susceptible to it. Materials used in reactor systems are engineered to survive a harsh environment. There will have to be some cleanout operations to remove the residual minerals and sodium chloride from the seawater, but those are things chemical engineers know how to do.

You need to relax. These are smart people dealing with the situation. They aren't going to be pumping things like sand and clam shells through the cooling systems. A little filtering goes a long way.

16 posted on 03/22/2011 7:02:06 AM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson