Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Officials: US Missile Attack On Libya Prepared
Breitbart ^ | March 19, 2011 | By Robert Burns

Posted on 03/19/2011 10:49:28 AM PDT by Strategy

WASHINGTON (AP) - The U.S. prepared to launch a missile attack on Libyan air defenses, but American ships and aircraft stationed in and around the Mediterranean Sea did not participate in initial French air missions Saturday, according to two U.S. officials familiar with the unfolding intervention.

One official said the U.S. intends to limit its involvement - at least in the initial stages - to helping protect French and other air missions by taking out Libyan air defenses.

An attack against those defenses with Navy sea-launched Tomahawk cruise missiles was planned for later Saturday, one official said. Both officials spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of military operations.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2disarmoursevles; 2throwawaymoney; 2wastemissles; 2weakenamerica; france; libya; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

1 posted on 03/19/2011 10:49:31 AM PDT by Strategy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Strategy

Who’s paying us for this?


2 posted on 03/19/2011 10:50:44 AM PDT by GoDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategy

3 posted on 03/19/2011 10:51:47 AM PDT by Christian Engineer Mass (25ish Cambridge MA grad student. Many younger conservative Christians out there? __ Click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategy

arent the tomahawks like $1 million a shot?


4 posted on 03/19/2011 10:53:13 AM PDT by beebuster2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategy

Has Congress declared war on Libya? By what authority are war actions authorized?


5 posted on 03/19/2011 10:55:52 AM PDT by mountn man (The pleasure you get from life, is equal to the attitude you put into it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategy

No War for oil?

Why is Obama rushing us into war?


6 posted on 03/19/2011 10:56:11 AM PDT by Tempest (I put money ahead of people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategy
NO WAR!! NO WAR!!

NO BLOOD FOR OIL!!

;-)

7 posted on 03/19/2011 10:58:35 AM PDT by Allegra (Hey! Stop looking at my tagline like that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategy

Isn’t there a general rule that in war you don’t announce your plans in advance to the Associated Press? What is going on here?


8 posted on 03/19/2011 11:00:35 AM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategy

For decades, the UN and lefties were OK with Gaddafi. Now suddenly he must be run out of town? Why him and not Iran’s Ahmadinejad? They both had protestors in the streets.


9 posted on 03/19/2011 11:02:02 AM PDT by LibFreeOrDie (Obama promised a gold mine, but will give us the shaft.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategy

So, we`re going to fire missiles into Libya and break a lot of their stuff and kill some Libyans.

OK, fine. Then what?

...whoops.. we didn`t plan that far ahead.


10 posted on 03/19/2011 11:02:33 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Libya is NOT our fight. Think LONG TERM!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategy

Who’s calling the shots? Did Barry delegate????


11 posted on 03/19/2011 11:03:04 AM PDT by ReverendJames (Only A Painter Or A Liberal Can Change Black To White.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mountn man

What? No shrill cries from the peacenik LibDems on Capitol Hill? No lamentations from the hippies? Where’s the love?


12 posted on 03/19/2011 11:03:32 AM PDT by PowderMonkey (WILL WORK FOR AMMO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Strategy

Jeez, guys- has everyone forgotten that Quadaffi personally ordered the murders of hundreds of Americans at Lockerbie?

My main problem with Obama’s handling of this is that he seems to be acting in his typically pansy and politically calculating way- using missiles so no there’s no political risk of our losing pilots.

I have no problem at all with stopping a known terrorist using military means.


13 posted on 03/19/2011 11:04:30 AM PDT by TroutGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategy

The OBVIOUS end to this mess is the Reagan Solution.

BOMB QUADAFFY!

Stop farting around the edges.
No fly zone, what a joke.


14 posted on 03/19/2011 11:06:52 AM PDT by Marty62 (Marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoDuke

YOU are!


15 posted on 03/19/2011 11:07:19 AM PDT by Marty62 (Marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Strategy

Did they announce the exact time so Kadaffy the loon can escape?


16 posted on 03/19/2011 11:07:54 AM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid! (Obama:If They Bring a Knife to the Fight, We Bring a Gun (the REAL Arizona instigator))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TroutGuy
"Jeez, guys- has everyone forgotten that Quadaffi personally ordered the murders of hundreds of Americans at Lockerbie?"

I haven't forgotten. My point is, if a Republican president was doing this, the LibDems would be going absolutely apeshirt and foaming at the mouth in opposition. Team Obama acquiesced to an early release of the Lockerbie bomber, without so much as a whimper.
17 posted on 03/19/2011 11:12:19 AM PDT by PowderMonkey (WILL WORK FOR AMMO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Strategy

Why not wait until Col. Daffy makes another public showing in his Lady GaGa outfit and take him out with a cruise and/or a drone?

GAME OVER!


18 posted on 03/19/2011 11:12:27 AM PDT by Kahuna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marty62

Probably my great grand children will be paying for it.


19 posted on 03/19/2011 11:12:35 AM PDT by GoDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mountn man

According to Hitlery he doesn’t need Congress.

But ofcourse her hubby Bubba violated it routinely.

The War Powers Resolution (WPR) was an act passed by Congress in 1973, over President Richard Nixon’s veto, to “insure that the collective judgment of both the Congress and the President will apply to the introduction of United States armed forces into hostilities.” The War Powers Resolution restricted Presidential war making to situations in which Congress had declared war or had given the President specific permission to use the armed forces in hostilities or in which the nation, its territories, possessions, or armed forces had been attacked.

Read more: http://www.answers.com/topic/presidential-powers#ixzz1H4P01pZu


20 posted on 03/19/2011 11:13:04 AM PDT by Marty62 (Marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson