To: SaveTheChief
She was making a connection with the Indian audience who have had a woman as president (Prime Minister) and can relate--see the notation of their reaction. But obviously this level of personal diplomacy escapes the kneejerk pocket-protecter dweebs around here.
To: hinckley buzzard
But obviously this level of personal diplomacy escapes the kneejerk pocket-protecter dweebs around here. It does indeed. Or maybe some of these "knee-jerks" are part of the anti-Palin GOP establishment? Their inane objections to Palin suggests they very well could be.
133 posted on
03/19/2011 11:32:01 AM PDT by
upsdriver
(to undo the damage the "intellectual elites" have done. . . . . Sarah Palin for President!)
To: hinckley buzzard
But obviously this level of personal diplomacy escapes the kneejerk pocket-protecter dweebs around here. If you don't like the forum, you're free to leave.
I find it rather Orwellian to call this speech "personal diplomacy."
189 posted on
03/19/2011 11:57:48 AM PDT by
fightinJAG
(I am sick of people adding comments to titles in the title box. Thank you.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson