She said it in response to a question, “Do you think a woman *can* become President of the United States?” I don’t remember the exact phrasing. She replied that being female isn’t an impediment and then said that. I’m female and would much rather have a man than a woman be President subject to the condition that he be the stronger candidate.
I want a candidate who will take the oath of the presidency seriously. I want a candidate who understands the Constitution and won't be working 24/7 to destroy it. I want a candidate who understands that government is the preventer of freedom, not the granter of freedom.
I want a candidate who views the ever-expanding federal government as an impediment to liberty. I want a candidate who is not afraid to express the opinion that the sixteenth and seventeenth Amendments are such impediments to liberty and need to be repealed to restore the promise of the Founders.
I want a candidate who clearly understands that the nation can no longer travel down the path the federal government has set for us because it is a dead-end to poverty and tyranny.
This kind of conversation, concerning skin color or gender being a qualification or an impediment to anything, is the kind of thing the Left obsesses about. I simply won't entertain it. There is far more at stake.
This is good to know. It makes a difference.