I believe that is exactly what the article says, that the death panel deemed the home monitoring to be inconclusively beneficial.
In the comment section of the article, a physician states that the federal government has already cut the monitoring devices for medicare patients and that he has seen patients die as a result. I guess that is what the government intends.
I believe if you read the 152 page paper, you can rely on what they actually said, rather than what a bunch of reporters wants you to see.