Posted on 03/17/2011 7:35:49 AM PDT by JesseWatters
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is fed up with President Obama and his refusal to back a no-fly zone over Libya, according to an exclusive report in The Daily. Shes trying to do what she can to keep things from imploding, a Clinton insider told the online newspaper. If you take a look at whats on her plate as compared with whats on the plates of previous secretary of states theres more going on now at this particular moment, and its like playing sports with a bunch of amateurs.
(Excerpt) Read more at nation.foxnews.com ...
She is playing the “I’m a more committed communist than you” card.
It should fly with the money part of their base.
You even have to ask? The Rancid Media will do everything they can to save Obozo.
Well, get in line, Hillary. We’re ALL fed up with 0bama.
0bama's foreign policy shop is, after all, headed by She Who Must Not Be Named, so hearing her bellyache about it strikes me as a little rich. But it isn't anything we haven't pointed out on FR from day one, when of all people on the planet, Zbigniew Brzezinski was trotted out as a "realist" and a lynchpin of a set of policies that are being called Carteresque for a very good reason.
I do think SWMNBN would have made a very good Vice President on the Darth Cheney model but she'd have had to possess the invaluable and difficult-to-master ability to subordinate and I don't think there's room in the Fun House for more than one ego that bloated. Try to imagine going rogue on your boss, though, and having to sit in a meeting under that basilisk gaze. Van Jones would be peeing his tailored trousers. And let's face it, the only difference between Cheney's dove hunt and Hil's little trip to Fort Marcy Park is that Cheney's bud lived to tell the tale.
But no, SWMNBN is now slotted into a position for which she is nearly perfectly unqualified unless one counts exchanging air kisses with Mrs. Arafat, and God help the poor bacterium caught between those two epidermises. 0bama's foreign policy consists of precisely one dictum: ignore it and it will go away, and if it doesn't, blame Bush. There are cases, Libya being one, where this might not be bad because after all, the only winner when two scorpions are in a bottle is the guy placing the lucky wager. But it certainly isn't anything on which to bet the safety of the country, because most of the time things don't go away. Mad Mo triumphant doesn't solve any problems, it only puts them off, but for someone as disengaged and incompetent as The 0ne, that's good enough. There'll always be the next guy to blame.
She has been looking “bad” and seems tired lately. I am sure the travel and powerlessness take a toll. Personally, I don’t think she’ll run. I don’t think she’ll be willing to put the energy into the campaign that would be required.
“Hillary! would be bad as president, but not nearly as bad as Obozo.”
Will you say the same thing in 2016? Right now, she’s campaigning for getting us involved in a third war in the middle east. She’s every bit as radical as Zero, every bit a power-hungry, and probably more capable of achieving radical goals.
Nudermine? A new FR classic is coined.
“Will you say the same thing in 2016? “
I disagree, completely. Hillary! is every bit as power-hungry, and she is a leftist. But, Hillary! was born an American. And while she may not like America, America is her homeland. Hillary! would like to be the one to transform America, but failing that, she’d be content being the first woman president, (if you don’t count the sissyboy Obama). I honestly don’t think Hillary! would enjoy presiding over a breakdown of America to achieve her goals.
Obama would be happy to go into the history books as the man who broke America.
Looking like that, she may WADDLE is 2012, but not run.
It's not. Obama and his group of toadies runs foreign policy -- or, actually, don't run it, since they never actually decide anything. Anything they don't agree with, they'll shut down.
Obama's rather egregious barbs about her at the Gridiron Club dinner are as much proof of a policy split between them, as they are that Obama's an asshole in addition to being a narcissistic incompetent.
Obama doesn't think in those terms. Obama is a narcissist. He thinks about Obama ... first, last, and always. "Obama's president, Obama has power, people stand in line to see Obama. People do what Obama says. Which is only right and good."
That's all you need to know about Obama. All if these nefarious plans people attribute to him .... nah. He's a head-case. It's all about him.
I used to think that was the deal all along. But 0 had Axelrod organize his reelection effort.
We’ll see. Normal people are better off not spending too much time analyzing lunacy.
“That’s all you need to know about Obama. All if these nefarious plans people attribute to him .... nah. He’s a head-case. It’s all about him.”
You could be right. I don’t claim to know what’s in his head or heart. But if you’re right, it means he’s incompetent to a degree we haven’t seen in modern times.
Well, seriously .... look at the last few weeks. Big Stuff is happening all over the world, and Obama is detached from events to a degree that is unprecedented in my memory (essentially back to Nixon).
He's still playing golf, going to parties, filling out his brackets, proposing huge spending plans as if borrowing a few more trillion is no big deal.... And flying off to Rio in a couple of days.
That degree of detachment at times like these suggest that the man is not just incompetent; he's not even inhabiting reality.
Sorry. I meant “undermind”.
Hillary is just a big of fan of Alinsky as obama. But she is probably more dangerous than barry because she can acctually focus on a goal. And she has the whole Bill Clinton network.
It kind of funny to watch this situation where one amatuer is fed up with the actions of another amatuer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.