Fair enough. I agree. That is why this issue is so unimportant to me. It gets us nowhere. To be honest again there really is no hard evidence other then speculation etc...so regardless if true or not it is a detriment to our policy arguments with people who are not consumed by this.
To me, Obama is secondary to the actual issue which is the loophole in the constitution that never requires proof. The constitution requires that he be a natural born citizen but leaves it up to the candidate’s party to declare him eligible.
I think the constitutional loophole can be closed in the individual state by a proof of eligibility requirement but it can’t be all about Obama.
I’m also concerned about the way liberals seem to bring it up when it starts to get quiet. After all, Cass Sunstein once wrote about leading political enemies astray with conspiracy theories and false conspiracy theories. When my congressman was asked about it, the guy who asked turned out to be a moonbat.