Replies

The lies continue.

The old Indiana lie. The judge with the circular logic to then issue a simple formal ruling - AFFIRMED was the total ruling. His puke the preceded was not a ruling. To imply otherwise is sick lie. WKA is THE most conversational ruling in SCOTUS history anyway. This Hoosier judge got his marching order and followed them. Put vomit down on paper to be used in forums like this and convince the masses that do not read legal brief that some actual law was made. Well, this ain’t *hitcago.

And - its ‘natural born Citizen’ not ‘Natural Born Citizen’. Abusing and misusing the term in the Constitution shows either a lack of understanding or lack of respect or both.

‘natural Citizen’ follows the father lineage.
‘born Citizen’ is a Citizen (note the capital C is used correctly) FROM BIRTH. When combined - ‘natural born Citizen’ is someone whose father was a Citizen (Obama’s was not) and who has been a Citizen from birth (Obama has not since he was an Indonesian citizen as a child).

Hence why Schatz and Hawaii Democratic Party NEVER declared Obama an Article II eligible candidate. NEVER. Schatz committed fraud and attempted to commit fraud and Pelosi baled him out with the CEO.

But Schatz did not want to commit the crime of declaring a knowingly ineligible candidate a valid one. That fraud - he did avoid.

So quote a hick judge from Hoosierville. But go find out why Schatz would not put his John Hancock on the OCON in Hawaii. When you have that answer - come tell us. Inside guy.

It was a three judge panel of the Indiana Court of Appeals that handed down that decision. When any judge or court renders a bad decision, they can be overturned on appeal to a higher court. No higher court, including the Supreme Court of the United States has reversed the decision of the Indiana Court of Appeals.

The Supreme Court of the United States has had a number of opportunities to rule on the deVattel-two citizen parents theory of natural born citizenship, in Kerchner v Obama, in Hollister v Soetoro, two times, and in Taitz v Obama. The Justices of the Supreme Court have not accepted any of these appeals for a hearing before the full Court.

Gee, when I look at what the Democrats sent to Hawaii’s Chief Elections Official, I see both Brian Schatz and Nancy Pelosi’s signatures:
http://moniquemonicat.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/hawaii-response.pdf
In any even, Obama submitted ballot certification forms and statements in all 50 states plus the District of Columbia and no state nor the federal district challenged his eligibility to be on the ballot.
In some states, like Arizona, Obama signed a state form attesting to the fact that he is a “natural born citizen of the United States” and there were no state challenges to his eligibility.
Here’s what he signed to get on the ballot in Arizona:
http://moniquemonicat.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/arizona-election-nomination-papers-barack-obama-signed-statement-he-is-a-natural-born-citizen2.pdf

Schatz committted outright fraud submitting an invalid OCON to the CEO.

Worse he left his fellow Democrats hanging by letting them submit and sign invalid candidate declaration docs in the states where it is required like Hawaii.

If I were democrat who sign off on Obama’s eligibility in other states I would be on the phone to Schatz asking what he knows. Because knows something. Had he not submitted incomplete documents, Madame speakers document would not have been needed.

So Schatz let his fellow Democrats commit fraud. Nice guy.