To: PROCON; warsaw44; ColdOne; Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!; GQuagmire; wintertime; Fred Nerks; ...
Senator Schumer is pretty sure that the Supreme Court is not one of the equal but separate branches of government, so as such it’s possible that Chuck’s advised the White House that they have the power to tell the Supreme Court what to do:The 0bama administration told the Supreme Court on Monday night it should stay away from a high-profile challenge to the 2010 health care law until after a lower court has had a chance to review the case.
. . . . !
68 posted on
03/15/2011 6:15:45 PM PDT by
LucyT
To: LucyT
We don’t have three separate branches. The Supremes evade the problem and the Legislature runs along behind The Won like a little puppy.
71 posted on
03/15/2011 6:23:36 PM PDT by
bgill
(Kenyan Parliament - how could a man born in Kenya who is not even a native American become the POTUS)
To: LucyT
Katyal also says Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli’s case is problematic because he may lack sufficient standing to challenge the health care law.And here's the same old "standing" crap dished out once again.
89 posted on
03/15/2011 7:03:53 PM PDT by
azishot
(Everyone is entitled to my opinion.)
To: LucyT
The Supreme Court should tell them to go to hell, but they won’t.
95 posted on
03/15/2011 7:19:13 PM PDT by
mojitojoe
(In itÂ’s 1400 years of existence, Islam has 2 main accomplishments, psychotic violence and goat curr)
To: LucyT
Considering the courts lack of action over the BC issue my money says our very corrupt SCOTUS will listen to the WhoreHouse and NOT take up the Obiecare Bill.
The whole system smells of rotting fish.
138 posted on
03/16/2011 5:05:12 AM PDT by
stockpirate
(Republican leadership is made up of SOCIALISTS, so they aren't caving.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson