Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: itsahoot

Yes, the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction. However, that does not mean the court must exercise its original jurisdiction (and, in practice, the court rarely exercises original jurisdiction). And that’s not even relevant here, since neither party has asked the court to take the case that way. The case has already been heard at the district level. The plaintiffs have asked the Supreme Court to take the case, on appeal, before it is heard at the circuit level. Obama, as a party to the lawsuit, is asking them not to do so. Original jurisdiction has nothing to do with this.


171 posted on 03/16/2011 9:47:44 PM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies ]


To: Conscience of a Conservative
However, that does not mean the court must exercise its original jurisdiction

I keep seeing this excuse all over this forum. The Court doesn't have to take any case, I guess, but they certainly should take this one, unless they intend to let ObamaCare be fully implemented before they take it up.

176 posted on 03/18/2011 11:32:07 AM PDT by itsahoot (Almost everything I post is Sarcastic, since I have no sense of humor about lying politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson