Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bvw

No doubt. But no one can deny that it is currently worse than Three Mile Island (5) and not as bad as Chernobyl (7).


10 posted on 03/15/2011 3:28:20 PM PDT by Dan Nunn (Support the NRA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Dan Nunn
TMI a 5? More like a 4, by their own metrics. The Japanese reactor is still only a 5 on their scale. It might become a 6. But here is the one '6' according to Wikipedia entry:
Kyshtym disaster at Mayak, Soviet Union, 29 September 1957. A failed cooling system at a military nuclear waste reprocessing facility caused a steam explosion that released 70–80 tons of highly radioactive material into the environment.
IMO the Japanese reactor park disaster will end up releasing one tenth of that or less. I would guess the release so far -- of radioactive material -- is under a ton. Since the NGO claims each level is 10x worse, we are still at a 5.
13 posted on 03/15/2011 3:42:33 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson