Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Qbert

Lets learn to stop using 40 year old plants and build safer more efficient new ones.


2 posted on 03/15/2011 8:56:06 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cripplecreek

Yes, that is the only good thing to come out of all this. There will be a lot learned.


3 posted on 03/15/2011 8:59:15 AM PDT by refermech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: cripplecreek

I actually think that could be used as political leverage. Let’s make nuke safer by modernizing our facilities.


8 posted on 03/15/2011 9:07:19 AM PDT by Free Vulcan (Vote Republican! You can vote Democrat when you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: cripplecreek

Right with you,

Inherently safe designs have been on the table since 1980 that are meltdown proof even with a loss of cooling, electrical, and complete loss of physical access.

The fact that we refuse to use these designs is a travesty.


9 posted on 03/15/2011 9:08:06 AM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: cripplecreek

The Japanese plants held up well, surviving one of the biggest earthquakes in recorded history.

It was the tsunami that caused the current problems.

Moral: do NOT build nuclear plants on the seashore. If these plants had been on high ground, they would be producing electricity today.


18 posted on 03/15/2011 9:28:33 AM PDT by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson