Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TopQuark

The point implementing a real gold standard one that isn’t manipulated would create a floor.

No one is advocating to adopt anything Roosevelt did or any other system that rewards cronies and allows for direct manipulation of our currency.

It brings to the top the exact problem. It really wasn’t a standard - just another hijacked term by the progressives to further their own agenda. It is not different than what the Fed does.

We need a tangible solid base for our currency.


46 posted on 03/15/2011 10:27:19 AM PDT by surfer (To err is human, to really foul things up takes a Democrat, don't expect the GOP to have the answer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: surfer
We need a tangible solid base for our currency.

Yes, of course. We and everybody else on earth needs that. And everyone that lived before us since Lydians started to use coins.

That is not what we were discussing, however. The question is whether gold standard is free from the ills of fiat money. It is not, as history amply demonstrates. Most proponents of gold standard are Utopians who simply disregard history and logic in order to conclude that gold standard is superior.

58 posted on 03/15/2011 5:17:29 PM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson