1 posted on
03/14/2011 4:20:27 PM PDT by
SteveH
To: SteveH
2 posted on
03/14/2011 4:24:55 PM PDT by
the invisib1e hand
(Every knife in my back pushes me forward.)
To: SteveH
Does Japan have a choice? Stay in the dark or use nuclear energy.
3 posted on
03/14/2011 4:26:15 PM PDT by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: SteveH
The timing of the near nuclear disaster at Fukushima Daiichi could not have been more appropriate. .... "appropriate?"
Can NO ONE write anymore.
4 posted on
03/14/2011 4:26:19 PM PDT by
maine-iac7
("We stand together or we fall apart" mt)
To: SteveH
Of course we will just have to ignore that the earthquake itself did nothing to damage the reactors.
5 posted on
03/14/2011 4:32:01 PM PDT by
Straight Vermonter
(Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
To: SteveH
Of course we will just have to ignore the fact that the earthquake itself did nothing to damage the reactors.
6 posted on
03/14/2011 4:32:40 PM PDT by
Straight Vermonter
(Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
To: SteveH
The timing of the near nuclear disaster at Fukushima Daiichi could not have been more appropriate.Wow.
7 posted on
03/14/2011 4:35:24 PM PDT by
xjcsa
(Ridiculing the ridiculous since the day I was born.)
To: SteveH
Excuse me? What pray tell are they supposed to do? This article is muck raking at its best.
9 posted on
03/14/2011 5:20:58 PM PDT by
yldstrk
(My heroes have always been cowboys)
To: SteveH
I kind of tune it outt whenever they mention Chernobyl.Chernobyl had no continment vessel this one has a doule containment.Stories like this are designed to incite panic in the no nukes crowd IMHO.
To: SteveH
I kind of tune it outt whenever they mention Chernobyl.Chernobyl had no containment vessel this one has a double containment.Stories like this are designed to incite panic in the no nukes crowd IMHO.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson