To: SeekAndFind
Yah, right...”experts say”...
2 posted on
03/13/2011 9:44:27 AM PDT by
Palladin
(Obama, Ayers, Dohrn, Trumka: birds of a feather.)
To: SeekAndFind
The greatest concern however is what effect is this tragic chain of events in Japan going to have on global warming? /MS
3 posted on
03/13/2011 9:45:12 AM PDT by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
To: SeekAndFind
Aww c’mon man, we got some top notch hysteria going on here.
5 posted on
03/13/2011 10:03:01 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
To: SeekAndFind
"Japan nuclear health risks low, won't blow abroad, experts say"
Unless something changes...again.
8 posted on
03/13/2011 10:15:30 AM PDT by
Mariner
(USS Tarawa, VQ3, USS Benjamin Stoddert, NAVCAMS WestPac, 7th Fleet, Navcommsta Puget Sound)
To: SeekAndFind
Experts say eggs are bad for you
wait
..experts say eggs are good for you!
Experts say coffee is bad for you
wait
..experts say coffee is good for you!
Experts say
..wait
.they changed their mind on that one too!
To: SeekAndFind
Back in 1945 there were two major radiation leaks. I’m pretty sure that the whole West coast of the United States was contaminated and everyone died. /s
To: SeekAndFind
Been thinkin’. The Sunday shows all trotted out the dire projections and political fallout that nukes will endure due to this. Let ‘em build that narrative. Then when it's shown that nukes can take a punch like the fourth strongest quake known to man with no human toll it becomes a P. R. winner. Keep in mind, also, that the lack of reliable backup power caused the cooling water crisis. Wind and Solar are the King and Crown Prince of intermittent and unreliable power and are not suitable alternatives. Stay positive.
13 posted on
03/13/2011 10:31:42 AM PDT by
PDMiller
To: SeekAndFind
Radiation Risk and Ethics by by Zbigniew Jaworowski SNIP -
The established worldwide practice of protecting people from radiation costs hundreds of billions of dollars a year to implement and may well determine the world's future energy system. But is it right?
SNIP-
It was under the same assumption that an ad hoc Soviet government commission decided to evacuate and relocate more than 270 000 people from many areas of the former Soviet Union where the 198695 average radiation doses from the Chernobyl fallout ranged between 6 and 60 millisieverts. (See the definition of the sievert.) By comparison, the worlds average individual lifetime dose due to natural background radiation is about 150 mSv. In the Chernobyl-contaminated regions of the former Soviet Union, the lifetime dose is 210 mSvand in many regions of the world it is about 1000 mSv. The forced evacuation of so many people from theirpresumablypoisoned homes calls for ethical scrutiny. Examining the physical and moral basis of that evacuation action and other radiation policies is the subject of this article.
Long read but good, comparing man made(minuscule) with natural and background radiation.
19 posted on
03/13/2011 11:20:58 AM PDT by
Species8472
(Welfare was never intended to be a career opportunity)
To: SeekAndFind
First, when the cooling system failed we were told that the situation is under control and there is no risk of radiation, now that the whole thing has blown up, we are told
once again that the 'risk' of widespread damage is low...... wonder what poor souls (ordinary Japanese) are actually going through....
All we can do is pray wholeheartedly for their safety
22 posted on
03/13/2011 12:08:52 PM PDT by
R4nd0m
To: SeekAndFind; All
All you wiseguys better take a look at today’s news.
Don’t blame me if all your young-uns are born with two heads.
26 posted on
03/14/2011 5:00:31 PM PDT by
Palladin
(Obama, Ayers, Dohrn, Trumka: birds of a feather.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson