Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Up to 160 may have radiation exposure in Japan nuclear accident
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/12/us-japan-quake-radiation-idUSTRE72B3IY20110312 ^

Posted on 03/13/2011 8:24:47 AM PDT by chessplayer

"TOKYO (Reuters) - The number of individuals exposed to radiation from the quake-hit Fukushima nuclear power plant in northeastern Japan could reach as high as 160, an official of Japan's nuclear safety agency said on Sunday.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bwr; fukushima

1 posted on 03/13/2011 8:24:50 AM PDT by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V09AANnaGks


2 posted on 03/13/2011 8:32:00 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

from CNN

Of the 100 people evacuated by bus, nine had been tested and one had been shown initially with a radiation count of 100,000cpm — a level at which experts say a person needs to be decontaminated. The other eight people showed counts ranging between 18,000cpm and 40,000cpm.


3 posted on 03/13/2011 8:42:50 AM PDT by janetjanet998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998

regarding to the people in the bus I just posted:

something just doesn’t add up to what Japan is saying

assuming no one lives right by the plant, (and that looks to be the case judeing by google earth) then how did these people get all that radiation?


4 posted on 03/13/2011 8:49:20 AM PDT by janetjanet998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998

Maybe it was the radioactive steam that was released? when the pressure got to high.


5 posted on 03/13/2011 9:15:50 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998
In your mind you need to separate radiation and contamination. Radiation is energy given off by radioactive decay. A radioactive material has atoms in it that are emitting energy. That is radiation. Contamination is radioactive material somewhere you don't want it. During a nuclear accident small amounts of radioactive material may be released into the air. This usually settles out close to the plant and is relatively short lived. That is it decays away quickly into nonradioactive material. That is why sheltering in place is a good way to deal with the situation. After a few days the radioactive material is gone. Further the the type of radiation and the energy level of that radiation is important. All this is taken into consideration in emergency plans. Contamination can be washed off usually with soap and water. Our standards for contamination is 100 cpm above background. That is if you have 100 counts above background (usually 200-400 counts) then you are considered contaminated. So by American standards all those folks are contaminated. They may have internal contamination. This may or may not be serious depending upon the isotope (type of radioactive material) involved. I suspect those folks will be just fine and live long lives. Remember “Radiation” is very sensationalized by the media because they don't understand it and fear drives ratings. Hope this helps.
6 posted on 03/13/2011 9:16:28 AM PDT by Nuc 1.1 (Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998
something just doesn’t add up to what Japan is saying assuming no one lives right by the plant, (and that looks to be the case judeing by google earth) then how did these people get all that radiation?

I was up in the wee hours this morning and heard the MP's spokesman, Tokyo Bob or whatever is name is (the new Baghdad Bob), go on and on about nothing to see, move along, everything is under control, we are working at normal daily routines, blah, blah, blah. Excuse me, but normal is not having 150 people with radiation sickness. Normal is not evacuating for miles around and handing out iodine. Normal is not pumping in sea water that will kill the facility. So, yeah, I agree and have been saying so for a couple days that someone is not telling the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

7 posted on 03/13/2011 10:33:11 AM PDT by bgill (Kenyan Parliament - how could a man born in Kenya who is not even a native American become the POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nuc 1.1

I have worked with chemical cleaning agents at nuclear power facilities. I have talked to HPs (Health Physics personnel) who were wary of the chemicals in our process much more than any radiation or radioactive contamination. You can easily quantify radiation exposure and contamination, both short and long term, with the right equipment. Exposure to many chemicals is not as easy to measure.


8 posted on 03/13/2011 10:41:22 AM PDT by kickstart ("A gun is a tool. It is only as good or as bad as the man who uses it" . Alan Ladd in 'Shane')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kickstart

With you on that account. Humans are pretty cavilier with chemicals. But not with radiation. I guess folks don’t worry about chemicals as much. Ignorance is bliss.


9 posted on 03/13/2011 6:26:43 PM PDT by Nuc 1.1 (Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson