Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin
A 7 number for worst case would be very low for disaster planning. I would question the accuracy of this.
22 posted on 03/13/2011 10:08:18 AM PDT by HereInTheHeartland (Yes We Can, have smaller government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: HereInTheHeartland

This is what happens when reporters try to distill very complex subjects into a few sentences for laymen readers.

The ability of a fault to release energy is related to the length of the fault. The amount of energy transmitted to a site depends on a number of factors, including the type of fault movement, the distance from the site, and the foundation conditions.

When evaluating a structure for seismic loading ALL potential faults are looked at and complex calculations made to determine the most critical ground motions. A short close fault may be more critical than a bigger one far away.

This is a young science and each earthquake allows new evaluations worldwide. Upgrades then have the potential to make facilities safer over time.


23 posted on 03/13/2011 10:32:50 AM PDT by BigBobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson