Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gambling Bills Knocking At Texas’ Door!
The Patriot Statesman ^ | 3-12-2011 | Donna Garner

Posted on 03/13/2011 6:32:06 AM PDT by BillKneer

Remember back when the conservative voters of this state won a massive victory on 11.2.10, and we felt Texas deserved a conservative Speaker who would appoint committee chairs and members who would further the conservative agenda? For over three months the conservatives in Texas waged a battle against the choice of Rep. Joe Straus as Speaker of the Texas House because we knew that Joe Straus was no conservative.

Unfortunately, on Jan. 11, 2011, Joe Straus was chosen once again to be the Speaker of the House, but not before he was forced to spend millions of dollars to hire 16 consultants and “buy” votes from his fellow House members, as reported by TexasGOPVote.com

(Excerpt) Read more at patriotstatesman.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: christian; culture; gambling; straus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: battletank

I don’t care if elderly women sit on a stool and drink and smoke and drop pennies in a slot machine until they fall off their stool. I would never say a word, but you can’t tell me that I can’t call it sleazy.


21 posted on 03/13/2011 10:37:20 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Ditter

How horrible! Anyone that chooses to put their own money in a slot machine (while drinking and smoking! Horrors!) is “sleazy”. I just might think the same of something you choose to do too, but I’m sure as hell not going to be all outraged and demand the state legislate away your rights to do it! But then I’m a conservative who believes in freedom.


22 posted on 03/13/2011 10:44:47 AM PDT by battletank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: catfish1957

I feel the same...why drive to Shreveport when you can put a few up off 35-E or 45-S and just keep the dollars in state.I mean what is it? An hour outside of Dallas til you get to a casino?

Silly...just build some here. Maybe limit them to 25 for the entire state?


23 posted on 03/13/2011 10:47:20 AM PDT by My Favorite Headache (In a world where I feel so small, I can't stop thinking big.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ

Yeah they get all of these major concerts that come through there as well...and it is in the middle of nowhere.

Plenty of land to put this in TX and keep it out of major cities. I say build em.


24 posted on 03/13/2011 10:49:03 AM PDT by My Favorite Headache (In a world where I feel so small, I can't stop thinking big.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: battletank

Great, that’s what freedom is all about. If the citizens of OK and LA want to permit gambling then that is their right.

“How will keeping more money in your state have Texas running more deficits pray tell?”

Gambling isn’t productive. All it does is take money that the citizens already have and could spend on more productive things. The state would not gain anymore revenue then it already earns by opening casinos.

They would run more deficits, because when the state runs and manages a business, this costs more money. This money is money that can’t be recouped from productivity because gambling isn’t a productive enterprise.

“Playing a game for money is absolutely NONE of your business.”

You are right. If the state is going to run casinos with my taxpayer dollars, then I do have a say. If people want to run a cash poker game, guess what, that already happens. I can walk down the street to play with a group that meets regularly.

“Your own sense of “morality” is your concern and it is CERTAINLY not appropriate for a state to be legislating a game.”

It is appropriate if it takes the gambling interests and organized crime out of the state, and dumps them in LA and OK. Why would I want those parasites in TX?

“How is anyone playing a game harming you in the slightest?”

How does it benefit the state of TX?


25 posted on 03/13/2011 11:19:18 AM PDT by BenKenobi (Don't expect to build up the weak by pulling down the strong. - Silent Cal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: battletank

What do you propose be done about those who gamble excessively and end up on public assistance?


26 posted on 03/13/2011 11:21:05 AM PDT by BenKenobi (Don't expect to build up the weak by pulling down the strong. - Silent Cal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: battletank

I am not demanding anything, not of elderly women, not of the state NOTHING! If it turns up on the ballot for a vote, I am voting NO! I am free to think trying to get something for nothing is sleazy as you are to do it.


27 posted on 03/13/2011 11:29:54 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: BenKenobi
Gambling will not help TX. I left a pro gambling state. Gambling doesn’t produce any money at all.

Okay, I'll be opened minded about this. Tell me how those 92 texas vehicles (customers) (prob. every day) spending their money and taxes in Texas rather than Louisiana won't help our economy. Then add the employment.

Not saying you are wrong, and maybe I am not seeing something, but common sense would say that tax and revenues are leaving our state and are being added to theirs.

28 posted on 03/13/2011 11:43:58 AM PDT by catfish1957 (Hey algore...You'll have to pry the steering wheel of my 317 HP V8 truck from my cold dead hands)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BenKenobi

So many opinions and nothing to back it up.

As a Texan and a conservative I’ll spend my money any way I choose but I’m interested in how you think I should spend it.

Who said the state would be owning and managing casino’s?

If you want organized crime out of the state then shut down all these damn prison’s that are popping up all over the state. They do more damage than any casino ever will.


29 posted on 03/13/2011 11:51:20 AM PDT by Dusty Road
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: catfish1957

Your absolutely correct. The comment that gambling produces no revenue is foolish, I wonder how Vegas and the state of Nevada has survived as long as it has in such a money losing venture?


30 posted on 03/13/2011 11:56:04 AM PDT by Dusty Road
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Dusty Road

“Who said the state would be owning and managing casinos?”

The bill?

“As a Texan and a conservative I’ll spend my money any way I choose but I’m interested in how you think I should spend it.”

I personally don’t believe I have any right to regulate how you choose to spend your money. At present it’s not particularly difficult to gamble privately.

I do have a problem with Casinos. The state has a right to regulate the operation of businesses within their jurisdiction. At present that means no casinos. I support that stand, and I’ll vote against any public option to permit the building of casinos within Texas.

You have no right to take my money and use it for publicly funded Casino construction, just because it would benefit your recreational habits.


31 posted on 03/13/2011 11:58:32 AM PDT by BenKenobi (Don't expect to build up the weak by pulling down the strong. - Silent Cal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: BenKenobi

Okay, that is a moral opinion, but please still answer my question in post no. 28.....


32 posted on 03/13/2011 12:04:50 PM PDT by catfish1957 (Hey algore...You'll have to pry the steering wheel of my 317 HP V8 truck from my cold dead hands)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: catfish1957

My town had a similar debate. They were in a severely economically depressed area, and it was suggested that casino revenues would increase city revenue.

They built 3 casinos with public assistance, in a town of 80k. The result?

Businesses located downtown saw their business decrease. This forced them to go out of business and shutter their doors. Which resulted in a drop in taxation.

The Casino closed their downtown location, and managed to finagle a substantial property along the highway from the state. Exemptations to city taxes and state taxes. They built a much larger casino and hotel. The result was that the downtown core suffered from people actually going from the town center out to the casino.

Then the city, once again, funded and rebuilt a new casino downtown. Which the large casino operator sued and attempted to shut down. It still hasn’t opened as the city is fighting the casino operator.

The result? Three publicly built casinos, tax revenue for the city has gone down drastically, and tourism has actually declined. I used to work for a local developer, and we had a strategy put together to entrench on the assumption that revenue would drop. He had been considering expansion, but I told him that he would do well to hang onto what he had and try to ride it through.

The only person who’s actually benefitted from the casino is the owner, and his board. That’s it. Businesses have seen their revenue decline substantially, which has resulted in a lack of work for young people like me, meaning that even more people flee the economically depressed area which is in a death spiral.


33 posted on 03/13/2011 12:05:29 PM PDT by BenKenobi (Don't expect to build up the weak by pulling down the strong. - Silent Cal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: BenKenobi

Thanks...good compelling argument.


34 posted on 03/13/2011 12:07:42 PM PDT by catfish1957 (Hey algore...You'll have to pry the steering wheel of my 317 HP V8 truck from my cold dead hands)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: BenKenobi

Would your opinion be different if there was no public money involved?


35 posted on 03/13/2011 12:09:31 PM PDT by catfish1957 (Hey algore...You'll have to pry the steering wheel of my 317 HP V8 truck from my cold dead hands)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Dusty Road

Have you seen Las Vegas lately? Worst area in the nation economically.


36 posted on 03/13/2011 12:11:14 PM PDT by BenKenobi (Don't expect to build up the weak by pulling down the strong. - Silent Cal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: catfish1957

No, I don’t think Texas needs casinos. From what I can see private gambling seems to meet most Texans desires to gamble, without state regulation. Call it a triumph of small business.

I’m not a gambler myself although I have on opportunity participated in these hold’em games with a friend. He’d spot me in exchange for rides. We’ve won a fair amount, and I don’t consider it gambling because it’s not my money at stake.


37 posted on 03/13/2011 12:16:24 PM PDT by BenKenobi (Don't expect to build up the weak by pulling down the strong. - Silent Cal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: BenKenobi

What do YOU propose to do about anyone that is on public assistance for bad decisions? Let’s legislate away the “right” to drink beer or the “right” to do anything you don’t approve of! No one I know gambles excessively, yet they should be punished because someone else makes bad decisions? Maybe your answer lies in throwing money at “entitlements” rather than denying freedom to those who are responsible. Support of legislation to deny people the freedom to play a game because someone might abuse it is positively liberal at its core. Personal responsibility SHOULD be the conservative answer.


38 posted on 03/13/2011 12:18:46 PM PDT by battletank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: battletank

Then we can have casinos when welfare and social assistance are eliminated. At present I am forced to fund welfare and social assistance.


39 posted on 03/13/2011 12:22:18 PM PDT by BenKenobi (Don't expect to build up the weak by pulling down the strong. - Silent Cal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: BenKenobi
I thought that way not too long ago, but a few "private funded" geographically strategically located casinos (say Dalhart, ElPaso, Brownsville, Port Athur, Texarkana, Sherman, and maybe one midstate like Austin)might be acceptable.

Again, like I said, all privately funded.

I also would make sure these are located in a manner which would minimize impact to existing local businesses. Sending our tax dollars across the state line, still just doesn't make sense.

40 posted on 03/13/2011 12:25:13 PM PDT by catfish1957 (Hey algore...You'll have to pry the steering wheel of my 317 HP V8 truck from my cold dead hands)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson