“OK uh...
1. They were poor
2. They were just, wilding
3. Everybody does it
4. Its ok if they see it on TV
5. They had Urban Stress Disorder”
—How right you are: Actual quote from NYT ombudsman Arthur Brisbane (The NYT was criticized for not providing “balance” to an article about the rape):
“The Times should take care to interview mental health and legal experts who can provide context to a story about a vicious sex crime against a young girl.”
http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2011/03/times_public_editor_gang_rape.html
do they back the savages that did it claiming they are products of society so they are victims too, or simply they didn't do it, or
do they stick up for the mexkin girl(a toofer) and pander to women and the mexkins???
decision, decisions, decisions... their silence is deafening