Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: aumrl

You are probably correct, boronated water for the ‘slick’ system. Not a coolant actually, a fission poison.

What I have read seems to indicate that the boronated water system is still intact though. I am guessing they don’t want to fire it off and poison the whole loop. I’m not sure that will do much anyway. If the control rods fully inserted, there shouldn’t be any fission activity. What they have is decay heat.

OTOH, if they have lost the core geometry and fission is still going on, then they aren’t saving anything and may as well fire the boron. The reactor is trashed already.

But then again, I’m no nuclear engineer (even though I did once stay at a Holiday Inn Express). If there is someone out there who actually knows the operational specifics and can educate me, I’m all ears.


23 posted on 03/11/2011 12:06:55 PM PST by SargeK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: SargeK

Heavy water is also a good neutron absorber, just not as good as boron. Maybe adding heavy water to the water cooling system will damp the chain reaction while cooling the fuel rods.


28 posted on 03/11/2011 1:00:22 PM PST by RossA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: SargeK
The cooling system means not a whit when the electricity that runs the pumps goes down.

When the core remains active at a temperature that melts steel without coolant... It just does its thing.

We made them. We know the potential.

This is what we do.

No problem, except that hand of God thing.

32 posted on 03/11/2011 1:23:56 PM PST by mmercier (in the face lies the disgrace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson