Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Education Department's 82% Failure Rate
IBD Editorials ^ | March 10, 2011 | Staff

Posted on 03/10/2011 5:32:11 PM PST by Kaslin

Government: Education Secretary Arne Duncan blames — you guessed it — George W. Bush for the steep decline of public schools. How much failure does it take for politicians to recognize government as the problem?

It was shock time at the House Education and Workforce Committee on Wednesday. The U.S. Department of Education unveiled an almost unbelievable number regarding the breakdown of the public school system: By next year, some 82% of all U.S. public schools could be failing.

Secretary Duncan, in warning the panel, actually echoed longtime criticisms of federal education policy.

"By mandating and prescribing one-size-fits-all solutions," Duncan charged, the Bush administration's bipartisan No Child Left Behind law "took away the ability of local and state educators to tailor solutions to the unique needs of their students."

President Obama's purported answer is a political no-brainer: cut the locals some slack from federal rules.

But what Duncan actually proposes has been described as "a single national assessment system" by critics like University of Arkansas professor of education reform Sandra Stotsky, who was a longtime commissioner in the Massachusetts public school system.

A year and a half ago, Duncan was telling the National Press Club that the various state educational benchmarks amounted to "a race to the bottom" because "we have 50 different standards, 50 different goal posts."

(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: Kaslin
Just think what would happen if all those tax dollars spent on education and the educrats and their bureaucracy and corrupt unions actually went to the parents of children for their education.

I can think of a lot of things I could do for the kids if I didn't have to pay my feudal serfdom fees (i.e., property taxes) to rent my property from the government and fund public schools.

21 posted on 03/10/2011 6:09:32 PM PST by elk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

Do my eyes deceive me? Is the Secretary of Education admitting that Central Planning doesn’t work for education? Why the alternative would be...

Free enterprise? No, that would be unthinkable!


22 posted on 03/10/2011 6:09:38 PM PST by Qout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

“If every government school in this nation were to close tomorrow the **same** children who are getting an education today, would get one tomorrow. Why? Answer: Because all of the REAL work is being done IN THE HOME!”

Yes, that pretty much nails it. A large part of educational mythology is the belief that any gains that students make are a direct result of what goes on in the school. Educrats can’t fathom that people can learn anything on their own.


23 posted on 03/10/2011 6:23:42 PM PST by paint_your_wagon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: goldi

They have no incentive to get better, only incentive to get worse. The premise is always “We’re doing poorly because we don’t have enough money,” so the worse they do, the more money they need.


24 posted on 03/10/2011 6:37:59 PM PST by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Qout

Central planning never has and never will work.

Limited human knowledge within the most brilliant of us keeps it from happening.

Another hand planned this life we live, and he must be laughing at our efforts to “plan our future”.


25 posted on 03/10/2011 6:51:38 PM PST by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
We are currently under the rule of an entire race of pre-psychotic juvenile delinquents.


26 posted on 03/10/2011 6:53:01 PM PST by Dr. Sheldon Cooper (Incidentally, one can get beaten up in school simply by referring to oneself as one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
50 different standards, 50 different goal posts.

That is EXACTLY what is so great about the United States. We get 50 different models of experimentation. The best systems succeed, naturally. Other states emulate what works and eschew what doesn't work in the poorly scoring states. Plus, people and businesses both vote with their feet and move to the successful states.

With a one-size-fits-all federal model, every state is GUARANTEED to fail.

27 posted on 03/10/2011 6:56:19 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“By mandating and prescribing one-size-fits-all solutions,” Duncan charged, the Bush administration’s bipartisan No Child Left Behind law “took away the ability of local and state educators to tailor solutions to the unique needs of their students.”

Notice how fat boy Teddy skates on this one.


28 posted on 03/10/2011 6:58:55 PM PST by headstamp 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jnsun

Yes, close it totally. Win-Win!

http://www2.ed.gov/about/overview/budget/index.html

“ED currently administers a budget of $69.9 billion in discretionary appropriations (including discretionary Pell Grant funding) under the FY 2011 Continuing Resolution annualized level and operates programs that touch on every area and level of education. The Department’s elementary and secondary programs annually serve nearly 14,000 school districts and approximately 56 million students attending some 99,000 public schools and 34,000 private schools. Department programs also provide grant, loan, and work-study assistance to more than 15 million postsecondary students.”

Close it and all that spending goes away, and I am convinced that the quality of education would greatly improve...Win-Win!!!


29 posted on 03/10/2011 7:02:36 PM PST by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Aevery_Freeman; Texas Fossil

“...demand the privatization of education...”

Yes. Privatization is what is needed. I believe that the crux of the matter is in our state compulsory education laws.

Compulsory education laws enable the states to appropriate tax money. Then we get people in various levels of government trying to figure out just how that money gets spent rather than what’s best for any particular student.

Does my reasoning make sense?


30 posted on 03/10/2011 7:03:19 PM PST by paint_your_wagon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: paint_your_wagon

There was a time when local governments were in total control of their schools. They were public schools with local control, local hiring, local taxing, local funding, local supervision. That seemed to work with little resources.

That is not the case now.

Would private schools work? Possibly but there is no pattern that supports that now.


31 posted on 03/10/2011 7:07:37 PM PST by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

There would be absolutely no loss if this whole department were defunded and disbanded.


32 posted on 03/10/2011 7:24:04 PM PST by Rockitz (This isn't rocket science- follow the money and you'll find truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

It’s amazing how far we are away from what you describe.

It’s hard to imagine the Federal and State governments loosening their control of the system. Lot’s of money at stake.

It just seems more practical for parents to homeschool, or afterschool. There may be opportunities for some teachers to work within that market.


33 posted on 03/10/2011 7:34:59 PM PST by paint_your_wagon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Aevery_Freeman

They didn’t forget...


34 posted on 03/10/2011 8:16:09 PM PST by fatez ("If you're going through Hell, keep going." Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

There was a time when local governments were in total control of their schools. They were public schools with local control, local hiring, local taxing, local funding, local supervision.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Let’s call the above what it was and what it would be if we returned to it:

**Collectivism,

**Socialism,

**Voter mob control over the heart and souls of the captive children and parents under the thumb of the government to use it, and the feudal serfs ( misnamed property tax payers) force to pay for it.

ALL compulsory attendance, compulsory funded, government schools are a First Amendment and freedom of conscience abomination! This is true even if the school district was the size of suburban housing development.

Solution: Begin the process of privatizing **all** education on every level.


35 posted on 03/10/2011 8:55:50 PM PST by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: jnsun
1979.......

:}

36 posted on 03/10/2011 10:52:29 PM PST by AwesomePossum (I have never looked this forward to a November II........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I’d like to add, stop it with that “Integrated Math” crap!
That just teaches kids to hate Math.


37 posted on 03/10/2011 11:02:13 PM PST by Amerikan_Samurai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Galtoid
There are no words.

I can find a few...

A Nation at Risk- 1983

and

A Nation Still at Risk- 2008

and

Teacher Tenure Reform- 2010

38 posted on 03/11/2011 11:19:25 PM PST by Publius6961 (There has Never been a "Tax On The Rich" that has not reached the middle class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Aevery_Freeman; Kaslin
"By mandating and prescribing one-size-fits-all solutions," Duncan charged, the Bush administration's bipartisan No Child Left Behind law "took away the ability of local and state educators to tailor solutions to the unique needs of their students."

This is hilarious beyond words. Of course Bush was stupid beyond words for allowing "partisanship (the old 'Rat definition)" to sucker him into signing on to this turkey. He should not have signed it; but...

Who wrote and pushed the Bill? and suckered or blackmailed Bush into signing it? Was it part of military appropriations?
I will have to back up are research that. But...

Conveniently for DemonRats, the media has forgotten that this was that grand educator, Ted “Killer Whale” Kennedy's bill.

39 posted on 03/11/2011 11:39:53 PM PST by Publius6961 (There has Never been a "Tax On The Rich" that has not reached the middle class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson