[ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas]

Let me add something on this, they can make moral argument on that but not a legal one, it clearly isnt one. It doest matter what Walker said on TV on that.

Let me try to make sense of this. One thing I heard is that the WI constitution has a very narrow definition of what "affects spending." Maybe the vote to pass the bill was legit. I suppose this plays out in court now, along with the "open meeting" issue.

[sickoflibs]

RE :”Let me try to make sense of this. One thing I heard is that the WI constitution has a very narrow definition of what “affects spending.”

It's been over two hours on MSNBC and that has not come up. Schultz has the 10 flee-baggers on right now 10:10 pm EST and they haven't suggested it yet. They are claiming the law demands they had more notice before a vote, but since they were in hiding, that's a loser moral argument.

Next segment Schultz has someone on to discuss legal options.

9:57 pm EST: ‘Porn Star Teacher Fired ‘ is the news story debate on Hannity. Not kidding!