Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wis. Senate approves bill to strip public employees of collective bargaining rights (18-1)
Twitter Breaking News ^ | March 09, 2011

Posted on 03/09/2011 4:34:05 PM PST by library user

In 18-1 vote, Wis. Senate approves bill to strip public employees of collective bargaining rights


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: collectivebargaining; fleebaggers; scottwalker; wi; wisconsin; wisconsinshowdown
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 261-272 next last
To: library user

LOL

WOW

The AP really twisted that story.

It`s all illegal and un-democratic !

LOL


81 posted on 03/09/2011 5:01:23 PM PST by Para-Ord.45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: library user

Wow. That headline’s not biased at all. /s


82 posted on 03/09/2011 5:01:26 PM PST by winstonwolf33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: library user
The traitor is: Sen. Dale Schultz (R-Richland Center) casting the no vote. If you are in his district sign the Dem. recall petition and then run a conservative against him in the primary.
83 posted on 03/09/2011 5:01:55 PM PST by Hamilcar_Barca
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

can any one tell me why the Wisconsin gov did not do this earlier?


84 posted on 03/09/2011 5:02:23 PM PST by warsaw44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: library user
Where is the word "all" in that headline?

It would teach them not to leave town again.

85 posted on 03/09/2011 5:03:19 PM PST by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to manage by central planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hamilcar_Barca; All
Email:

Sen.Schultz@legis.wisconsin.gov

86 posted on 03/09/2011 5:03:58 PM PST by winstonwolf33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: warsaw44
can any one tell me why the Wisconsin gov did not do this earlier?

I think he wanted the Dem's there to vote (even though they'd lose). But too much time passed. 19 days is 19 days too long.

87 posted on 03/09/2011 5:04:21 PM PST by library user (Just because you're homeless doesn't mean you're lazy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Mmogamer

Any unemployed teacher need a job? There will be lots available in the Badger State soon.


88 posted on 03/09/2011 5:04:29 PM PST by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: warsaw44

Couple possible reasons. They wanted to give every appearance of being fair and reasonable in the approach they were taking and they also probably wanted to make sure that doing it this way would pass constitutional challenge.


89 posted on 03/09/2011 5:05:04 PM PST by creeping death
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: HeartlandOfAmerica
Ummmm. Don’t the R’s need 19 to get the collective bargaining measure to pass?

No. There are 19 Rs and 14 Ds, 33 senators. Without any financial language in a bill only a simple majority, i.e., 17 votes are needed to pass or defeat a bill. In this case 18 Rs voted for the bill.

90 posted on 03/09/2011 5:05:34 PM PST by ProudFossil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: library user

Hoo-boy. We’ll be watching Greta tonite.


91 posted on 03/09/2011 5:05:36 PM PST by OKSooner (Obama confessed "his muslim faith" on the George Stephanopolous show on September 7th, 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Fine. For political reasons can understand. I thought that something technical had changed.


92 posted on 03/09/2011 5:05:46 PM PST by HeartlandOfAmerica (Insane, Corrupt Democrats or Stupid, Spinless Republicans - Pick America's poison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HeartlandOfAmerica
Just guessing, but my take is that the Republicans originally wanted to pass the whole thing. When the Dems ran, that was no longer possible. Had the Republicans immediately stripped the non financial parts from the bill, they would have been accused of being ruthless and acting in bad faith. By waiting, they were able to take the high ground and show that they gave the Dems a chance to be heard. The Dems didn't WANT to be heard, they wanted to obstruct. At some point, it was appropriate to act, and the Republicans have decided that it was now.

So, what's next? I hope that Walker and his legal advisers are considering declaring the Dems seats as being vacant. Since the White House is coordinating the recall of Republicans in Wisconsin, it is better to declare the seats as being vacant and forcing the Dems to fund the elections of the Dems as well as fund any recall effort. This can get excruciatingly costly for the Dems and their supporters.

93 posted on 03/09/2011 5:06:41 PM PST by Enterprise (TSA - The Silly Agency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: library user

govgeneral@wisconsin.gov

Don’t forget to say Thank You :) :)

God bless them, everyone!
Tatt


94 posted on 03/09/2011 5:06:41 PM PST by thesearethetimes... ("Courage, is fear that has said its prayers." DorothyBernard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: library user
I believe that once they have a quorum to conduct business, they only then need a simple majority of those present to pass legislation.

Bill could have passed with a 10-9 vote and be legal.

At least, that's the way I understand it. Bad move by the Democrats. Nice to see the Republicans actually do what the Dem's would have done to them.

95 posted on 03/09/2011 5:06:54 PM PST by sjmjax (Politicans are like bananas - they start out green, turn yellow, then rot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conscience of a Conservative

And when they return they have a quorum and then vote the whole bill in.


96 posted on 03/09/2011 5:07:02 PM PST by stockpirate (Underemployment, surged in February to 19.9%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: library user

And the lawsuit challenging this will be filed in three...two...one...


97 posted on 03/09/2011 5:07:41 PM PST by K-Stater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: library user
Wonder what "nearly" means? Would like to read the bill.

Don't think this has changed from the original bill. They can still bargain for wages only but not vacation, school year, hours, etc. A HUGE win for sane Americans. And I also heard that the payroll deductions for union dues will go away, making union members remit payment on their own.

98 posted on 03/09/2011 5:08:45 PM PST by fwdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: crz
I am not sure about laws in Wisconsin, but as I recall, if you want to bring a bill up for reconsideration someone needs to vote no. The no voter may have voted no for some parliamentary procedure rule.
99 posted on 03/09/2011 5:09:20 PM PST by Maine Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Conscience of a Conservative

Yes, you watch, the rats will win in the end, they always do.


100 posted on 03/09/2011 5:09:20 PM PST by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 261-272 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson