Our Obama's judges and their rulings defacto or de jure?

The Post and Email ^ | 3/9/2011 | Sharon Rondeau

[ExtremePatriot]

“There have been 62 Obama judicial nominations confirmed including Supreme Court Justices Sotomayor and Kagan. It is unfathomable how far-reaching the consequences of an unlawful presidency would be. Federal judges hear hundreds of cases per year.”

[ExtremePatriot]

If Obama is exposed for the fraud POTUS that he is, the court system will be even worse than it is now with de facto judges making thousands of rulings.

[Tex-Con-Man]

Click your heels together three times and say..."If He's a usurper, all the laws and appointments will just go away..."

[Red Steel]

DC and much of this country would rather have their collective heads in...

[SaxxonWoods]

“It is unfathomable how far-reaching the consequences of an unlawful presidency would be.”

It's quite possible that's why Obama’s ineligibility will be ignored. It's obvious from remarks by Chief Justice Roberts and Clarence Thomas that the issue has been discussed ‘out of school’.

I predict the next Republican elected President won't touch the issue, and the next Democrat elected President will issue a preemptive pardon of Obama regarding eligibility issues.