>The ONLY way to get rid of a sitting President is through Congress. It is in the Constitution, folks.
So then you claim that any requirement the Constitution puts upon someone actually being President is irrelevant and/or illegitimate?
>All these lawyers — they’re wasting their time and talent on the Supreme Court, and it’s all for nothing because they, the Supreme Court justices, just don’t have the constitutional authority to do anything in this instance.
What of the above?
Leo Donofrio went through the courts trying to get a Supreme Court hearing on Obama legitimacy. He discovered the hard way that only congress can remove a president but that body delegated the power to remove a ursurper, via Quo warranto, to the District Court, Washington, D.C.
This is neither irrelevant nor illegitimate, it is just the way our Constitution works. (The President is an elected office, therefore political in origin, and he must be removed that way - by representatives of the people.) Unless we have moral and honorable people in our government, the Constitution doesn’t matter.
That’s when the 2nd Amendment kicks in, savvy? I’ve answered you posits.