She wasn't. She isn't. She didn't. There was no support as you describe it. She didn't. Not what you are making her stance out to be. Again, not what you are making it out to be. She didn't. The last one there I haven't looked in to.
There is no reasoning with you. You have your opinion of the above "issues" and you refuse to even entertain the idea that you may be blowing sh*t out of proportion.
Palin is by far the most conservative candidate we've had in a long time. Especially in light of McCain, Dole, and Bush.
Is she perfect? No. She's just better than anyone else out there on the horizon.
She wasn't.
Is that so? Look at this ignorant drivel!
Dear Senator Stevens and Senator Murkowski - It is my understanding that the US Senate may consider the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea this fall. With this in mind, I'm writing to express my strong support for ratification of the convention. In my opinion, the convention would be beneficial to the US and Alaska in various ways, but I want to focus on one aspect in this correspondence.
http://globalsolutions.org/files/general/Palin_LOS_Letter.pdf
***********
Or for having McCain’s amnesty plan?
She isn't.
Is that so?
VAN SUSTEREN: Governor Palin, if you were vice president today, what would you be telling a President McCain about what to do about immigration, if anything?
PALIN: I support his position on immigration.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,590022,00.html
*********
Or for ignorantly supporting Title IX federal intrusiveness?
She Didn't.
Is that so?
"Now, I was a product of Title IX, where legislation allowed that equal opportunity. Now, if we have to still keep going down that road to create more legislation, to get with it in the 21st century, to make sure that women do have equality, especially in the work place, then we're there, because we understand that, in this age, we have all got to be working together," Palin said. "But yup, equality for women, for all, that's going to be part of the agenda, and I thank you for that question."
That there is PATHETIC LIBERALISM.
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/09/palin-takes-que.html
*********
Or for her pathetic support of Cap and Trade (just not Obama’s version)?
There was no support as you describe it.
Is that so? Let's see the flim flam in her directives to her newborn Algorian Climate Change Subcabinet that she created:
PURPOSE AND DUTIES
9. the potential benefits of Alaska participating in regional, national, and international climate policy agreements and greenhouse gas registries;
10. the opportunities to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from Alaska sources, including the expanded use of alternative fuels, energy conservation, energy efficiency, renewable energy, land use management, and transportation planning;
12. the opportunities to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the operations of Alaska state government;
13. the opportunities for Alaska to participate in carbon-trading markets, including the offering of carbon sequestration;
Now why on God's Green Earth would ANYONE want to be part of a "carbon trading" market who didn't beleive in Cap and Trade. THERE WOULD BE NO CARBON TRADING MARKETS without cap and trade. CARBON TRADING MARKETS ARE CAP AND TRADE.
http://www.gov.state.ak.us/admin-orders/238.html
*********
Or for her cheerleading for TARP?
She didn't.
Is that so?
John McCain thankfully has been one representing reform. Two years ago, remember, it was John McCain who pushed so hard with the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac reform measures. He sounded that warning bell.
People in the Senate with him, his colleagues, didn’t want to listen to him and wouldn’t go towards that reform that was needed then. I think that the alarm has been heard, though, and there will be that greater oversight, again thanks to John McCain’s bipartisan efforts that he was so instrumental in bringing folks together over this past week, even suspending his own campaign to make sure he was putting excessive politics aside and putting the country first.
If that ain't cheerleading, then nothing is.
http://washingtonindependent.com/68578/yes-palin-backed-the-bailouts#
****************
Or her “state’s rights” position on abortion?
Not what you are making her stance out to be.
Is that so? Funny, once again, from her own lips...
Q: Why is Roe v. Wade a bad decision?
A: I think it should be a states’ issue not a federal government-mandated, mandating yes or no on such an important issue. I’m, in that sense, a federalist, where I believe that states should have more say in the laws of their lands and individual areas. Now, foundationally, it’s no secret that I’m pro-life that I believe in a culture of life is very important for this country. Personally that’s what I would like to see further embraced by America.
Wow. 'States rights' on human life. Nanny state totalitarianism on women's sports. Go figger.
http://www.ontheissues.org/sarah_palin.htm **********
More later. But every claim I make is absolutely true. Backed by Palin's own words. I don't give a rat's rear end how her legions of sycophants try to spin it. If this were any other politician, they would NEVER be forgiven for such rank liberal stupidity, even if they flip flopped, like Palin surely will, if she runs.