Thanks, but if you are logged in, you already subscribe to my newsletter!
Way back when, when Science and Nature were running articles about anthropogenic carbon dioxide, I wrote them a letter in which I took the global increase in CO2 from two papers, converted that to a mass of CO2, then took a paper on anthro produced CO2, and integrated the curve to get the anthro mass increase, and pointed out that the apparent global CO2 increase was a factor of ten bigger than the human-produced amount. This really was merely putting the various reported numbers in the same units system, nothing complex.
They never published the letter, either magazine, but it was after that that the greens started looking for cow farts and termite breath to make up the gap. By now, the numbers all agree, almost ALL global CO2 is accounted for by human activity!
This is I think why the public screwels de-emphasize math and science, it’s too easy to refute the claims of the greens.
I was just funning ya.
Truth be told, life would cease to exist without C02
Somehow I think we are minor players in all this.