Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cobra64
"You may be confused as to the difference between a .357 magnum, typically shot in a revolver, versus the relatively new round .357 Sig that was developed in 1994. The new cartridge was named "357" to highlight its purpose: to duplicate the performance of 125-grain .357 Magnum loads fired from 4-inch barreled revolvers, in a cartridge designed to be used in a semi-automatic pistol."

That is precisely the case (and part of the reason for my qualifier question in the original post). Squantos and others (you included) have been excellent sources of info. I have seen an article in the NRA mag (American Rifleman) on the cartridge fairly recently (I think late last year), but didn't garner the details given in the responses here from that article. I'm pretty sure there is at least one "true" .357 magnum semi-auto, but I gathered that it was "unusual" and a rarity.

Again, thanks to all who responded.

44 posted on 03/06/2011 3:26:19 PM PST by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: Wonder Warthog
I'm pretty sure there is at least one "true" .357 magnum semi-auto, but I gathered that it was "unusual" and a rarity.

That would be the Coonan.

Linky: http://world.guns.ru/handguns/hg/usa/coonan-e.html

An acquaintance of mine has one, though I've not had the pleasure of shooting it.

46 posted on 03/06/2011 5:20:18 PM PST by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson