Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CharlesWayneCT
Your reasoning is flawed, and therefore your conclusion is unpersuasive.

Legally, it is a use tax, not a "sales tax." Your reasoning is flawed, and therefore your conclusion is unpersuasive.

18 posted on 03/05/2011 9:38:16 AM PST by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to manage by central planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Carry_Okie

That is a flaw in word usage, not reasoning. Just trying to keep it simpler; the use tax is, for every state I’ve studied, defined with the sales tax, and implemented congruently. The distinction is meaningless to the argument, and therefore your objection is not meaningful; I do however thank you for clarifying the term, as I could have mentioned it.


19 posted on 03/05/2011 12:47:14 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson