Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Titus-Maximus

Not that I appreciate the privileges libs afford themselves...but in this case....I would not send my kid to public school with a SS detail if I were POTUS. Too much of a security risk and hassle IMO..


8 posted on 03/04/2011 7:35:34 AM PST by LaineyDee (Don't mess with Texas wimmen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: LaineyDee

That makes no sense - why should a private school be inherently more safer than a public school? That was a straw man that the liberals used to justify Chelsea Clinton going to a private school.

If public schools are that dangerous - shouldn’t something be done? Are you saying we cannot protect children in a public school? Amy Carter was protected.


9 posted on 03/04/2011 7:39:25 AM PST by Titus-Maximus (Light from Light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: LaineyDee

Agreed; simple fact: it’s much easier for the Secret Service to monitor and protect the President’s children in a smaller private school than the Public schools. It would also be less costly (fewer agents needed, fewer observation posts, fewer police needing to patrol the immediate neighborhood). I doubt the question of “Union” teachers ever entered into the equation.


10 posted on 03/04/2011 7:42:58 AM PST by theDentist (fybo; qwerty ergo typo : i type, therefore i misspelll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson