Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Hammers Obama and Obamacare
A1NewsPage.com ^ | March 3rd, 2011 | A1 News Page

Posted on 03/03/2011 7:27:09 PM PST by NolibBias

(A1NewsPage.com) Federal Judge Roger Vinson again stated that the Obamacare law is unconstitutional and gave the Obama Administration only 7 days to appeal his order in the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals. The judge said the Congress exceeded its authority with an individual mandate to buy insurance and that his order included all parts of the law because it is unseverable to the rest of the act.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: healthcare; judgevinson; obamacare

1 posted on 03/03/2011 7:27:10 PM PST by NolibBias
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NolibBias

I predict the Obama administration thumbs their nose once again, at this latest ruling. What’s the judge going to do, slap them with a “contempt of court” ruling? Who’s going to enforce it—the Justice Department? Obama will ignore this, and cause yet another, Constitutional crisis.


2 posted on 03/03/2011 7:56:01 PM PST by Lou L (The Senate without a fillibuster is just a 100-member version of the House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lou L

Meanwhile, the WSJ is reporting the same story under the headline “Judge gives Obama care reprieve”. WTF?


3 posted on 03/03/2011 8:42:55 PM PST by j-damn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: j-damn

Meanwhile, the WSJ is reporting the same story under the headline “Judge gives Obama care reprieve”. WTF?
*************************************
It was a 7 day reprieve.


4 posted on 03/03/2011 9:20:33 PM PST by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lou L

It would only become a constitutional crisis if Obama ignores the court’s order AND Congress then refused to impeach/convict. So, if Obama ignores the court it would land squarely on the House to take the next step...and the House has an “ear” toward their constituents right now for the most part. My guess is that a genuine threat of impeachment (drawing up articles) would do the trick (get Obama to comply).

I figure Obama will likely file an appeal within the time frame given and then try to keep implementing until a final decision is made on the appeal by the SCUSA.


5 posted on 03/03/2011 9:49:12 PM PST by Let_It_Be_So
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Let_It_Be_So
I figure Obama will likely file an appeal within the time frame given and then try to keep implementing until a final decision is made on the appeal by the SCUSA.

I would've thought it would be in the administration's best interests NOT to have SCOTUS rule on this for as long as possible. Given that Obama would likely receive very good media coverage, he'd probably love for the House to take on impeachment. Just imagine the headlines: "GOP House Tries Yet Again to Take Down Popular President!" and "Reid Says No Way in Hell President Will be Convicted!"

6 posted on 03/04/2011 7:01:20 AM PST by Lou L (The Senate without a fillibuster is just a 100-member version of the House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

should have read:

“Judge orders Obama, APEAL OR SHUT UP.”


7 posted on 03/04/2011 10:56:00 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lou L

I agree with you that the Obama administration would want to delay as long as possible, but the ability to delay longer than 7 days was basically taken away from them by the court’s decision. The way I understand it, the judge granted a stay of his original order IF the defendants file for an appeal within a 7 day timeframe.

The judge further requested that the appeals court expedite the appeal so that it could be heard by the supremes as soon as possible. I don’t know if the appeals court will honor the lower court’s request, but I suspect they will, and if they do then the defendant’s ability to delay has been effectively and considerably limited.

Therefore, if my analysis is correct then the only avenue left for the administration to continue to drag their feet is to simply ignore the court and that is where the threat of impeachment becomes more viable (the Executive willfully and blatantly defying a federal court order would not sit well with the vast majority of the American people in my opinion).

In other words, the Administration was effectively boxed in by this judge... either comply with the order of the court or face the consequences which would include but not be limited to a real threat of impeachment. Again, I suspect the administration will blink and file the appeal within the 7 day window.


8 posted on 03/04/2011 6:06:54 PM PST by Let_It_Be_So
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Let_It_Be_So
During the period between filing of the appeal, and the hearing of the appeal, and a ruling, does the Admin cruise ahead with Obamacare, as they are now doing?

Or does Vinson's original ruling ... a functional equivalent of an injunction ... remain in force? KB=confused here.

9 posted on 03/04/2011 10:47:06 PM PST by Kenny Bunk (Odd, but I never had to ask, "Who, or what exactly is Dwight Eisenhower?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk

My understanding is that Vinson’s original ruling is basically “on hold” until the appeals have run their course, assuming that the Administration complies with his 7-day timeframe.

Therefore, lacking a specific injunction restricting the Administration during the appeals process, the law is still in effect and the “implementation” of that law can legally go forward. That’s the reason, I presume, the judge asked the appeals court to expedite the matter so it can get to the Supreme Court as soon as possible.

At least, that’s the way I see it but I’m certainly no legal expert.


10 posted on 03/06/2011 2:20:26 PM PST by Let_It_Be_So
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson