regardless of how many judges make bad decisions , the people of the United States have a right for a legally elected President sitting in the white House. Any questions about the eligibility needs to be addressed , not concelled by a few liberal judges.
The Congress isn’t interested either. The Speaker of the House says that the state of Hawaii vouching for Obama’s birth there is good enough for him and the Republican majority leader says that Obama’s eligibility isn’t a policy issue that needs to be on the table.
The American people will get another shot at Obama on the first Tuesday in November, 2012.
69,456,897 votes were tallied for Obama, so concerns about his eligibility were not significant enough for an electoral majority to reject him. That was the most votes for any presidential candidate in the history of the republic. No other branch of government is going to disenfranchise a national electoral majority.
If significant and concrete evidence of Obama’s ineligibility were to be uncovered, the Congress might impeach him or his own Democratic Party might pressure him to resign the way Richard Milhouse Nixon did.
Both the Watergate Grand Jury and the Watergate Committee in Congress provided the evidence that removed Nixon.
The same thing could happen with Obama is there were to be solid evidence.
Thus far such concrete evidence has not emerged which is why a REPUBLICAN Judge appointed by George W. Bush called “birther” evidence “spurious” and lawsuits that challenge Obama to be “frivolous.” And that’s why that same REPUBLICAN judge fined “birther” attorney Orly Taitz $20,000 for wasting his time with nonsense and that’s why a CONSERVATIVE majority on the US Supreme Court upheld that $20,000 sanction.