Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Joule Unlimited On Track To Beat All Known Biofuel Processes
BioFuel Daily ^ | 2/25/2011 | Staff Writers

Posted on 03/02/2011 2:44:33 PM PST by Wonder Warthog

Joule Unlimited has invented a genetically-engineered organism that it says simply secretes diesel fuel or ethanol wherever it finds sunlight, water and carbon dioxide.

The Cambridge, Mass.-based company says it can manipulate the organism to produce the renewable fuels on demand at unprecedented rates, and can do it in facilities large and small at costs comparable to the cheapest fossil fuels.

Joule's process directly yields hydrocarbons that are fungible with existing diesel infrastructure, unlike the biodiesel product that is produced from algal oil.

Highlights include:

Based on empirical measurements, Joule can directly produce 15,000 gallons of diesel per acre annually, as compared to 3,000 gallons of biodiesel produced indirectly from algae.

The solar-to-product conversion efficiency of Joule's direct, continuous process for producing diesel, ethanol and chemicals is between 5 and 50X greater than any biomass-dependent process, and gains additional efficiencies by avoiding downstream refining.

Joule's combined advances in genome engineering, solar capture and bioprocessing result in photosynthetic conversion efficiency of more than 7% relative to available yearly solar energy striking the ground, many times greater than prior


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: biodiesel; biofuel; diesel; energy; geneticengineering; johnpodesta; joule; podesta
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: Wonder Warthog

A salt water algae is still algae even if it’s called a “highly engineered photosensitive organism in non-freshwater solution”.

and the promise of about 9 1/2 millions gal. per year per square mile.....right.


41 posted on 03/02/2011 4:26:57 PM PST by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: TsonicTsunami08
Scamorama??? Lemme see, suck some "stimulus" money with help of Podesta, then pssshhhhtt

Joule Elects Former White House Chief of Staff John Podesta to Board of DirectorsCambridge, Mass.

–January 18, 2011 –
Joule Unlimited, Inc., pioneer of Liquid Fuel from the Sun™, today announced the election of John Podesta to its board of directors. A veteran of two White House administrations, Mr. Podesta will bring considerable expertise to Joule in the realm of public policy as well as partnering with the public sector.
"Since inception, we've sought the guidance of truly world-class directors and advisors to help Joule convert a promising concept into a successful and potentially industry-changing enterprise. We are thrilled to welcome John to the team, given his extensive experience within the US government and internationally as well," said Bill Sims, President and CEO of Joule. "As a leading expert in technology policy and a known advocate for clean energy, John is an ideal champion for Joule, and we look forward to leveraging his insights as we progress towards international deployment."
Mr. Podesta's accomplished career on Capitol Hill spans 30 years. He is currently President and CEO of the Center for American Progress, a "think tank" organization that he founded in 2003 to help develop and advocate for progressive policy. He was previously White House Chief of Staff to President Clinton, serving in the president's cabinet and as a principal on the National Security Council. He also served as both an assistant to the president and deputy chief of staff, as well as staff secretary and a senior policy advisor on government information, privacy, telecommunications security, and regulatory policy.
Most recently, Mr. Podesta served as co-chair of President Obama's transition, where he coordinated the priorities of the incoming administration's agenda, oversaw the development of its policies, and spearheaded its appointments of major cabinet secretaries and political appointees. His prior positions on Capitol Hill included counselor to Democratic Leader Senator Tom Daschle; chief counsel for the Senate Agriculture Committee; and chief minority counsel for the Senate Judiciary Subcommittees on Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks; Security and Terrorism; and Regulatory Reform.
"There is no question that clean energy innovation and adoption are among the top economic and security priorities for our nation, and it's critical that we focus on breakthrough technologies, particularly for liquid fuels, that can sometimes fall through the legislative cracks," said Mr. Podesta. "I have seen and heard many proposals by renewable energy companies, and can unequivocally say that Joule has a technology and a system unlike any other, with industrial viability and a clear path to market within the next several years. It's an honor to join the board of a big-thinking category creator like Joule."
"Joule has an ambitious vision for the future of transportation fuels, with the ability to bring energy security to the US and to other regions around the world," said Noubar Afeyan, Founder and Chairman of Joule, and Managing Partner of Flagship Ventures. "With the valuable addition of John to our board, we've gained the strategic insights and support of a long-time government expert who can help Joule build the lasting relationships needed for long-term success."

42 posted on 03/02/2011 4:36:28 PM PST by Leo Carpathian (fffffFRrrreeeeepppeeee-ssed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Leo Carpathian
This is is stimulus cowbell... but at least it's not going to biofuels that decrease our food supply.


43 posted on 03/02/2011 4:53:05 PM PST by Minus_The_Bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: businessprofessor
(separation of diesel from water)

Didn't some actor come up with a mo'chine to do just that?

44 posted on 03/02/2011 4:54:55 PM PST by Mike Darancette (The heresy of heresies was common sense - Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: count-your-change
Where are they going to get the massive supply of C02 they need?

C02 is what causes the rapid growth of the algae. That is why the place these start ups next to power plants.
45 posted on 03/02/2011 4:57:20 PM PST by Minus_The_Bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: TsonicTsunami08
ManBearPig in all likelihood put up the start up money!

If it he did and it works then he will be richer than Bill Gates.

46 posted on 03/02/2011 4:57:51 PM PST by Mike Darancette (The heresy of heresies was common sense - Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

This sounds way too good to be true. About a gallon of diesel from every three square feet every year?


47 posted on 03/02/2011 5:01:06 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

Yeah, but better this than destroying potential food or arable land.


48 posted on 03/02/2011 5:04:43 PM PST by Minus_The_Bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: OregonRancher

Let’s see...The area of New Mexico is about 2000 square miles so if the optimistic figures work out in the field all that is needed is just one state covered with machines! Easy!


49 posted on 03/02/2011 5:14:23 PM PST by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Minus_The_Bear

Yes, if it works. Its selling point seems to be that with typical algae, you first have to squeeze out its vegetable oil, then mix it with lye and ethanol, then strain it to get biodiesel. But somehow their algae generates biodiesel directly, without poisoning itself, and in a concentrated enough form that it is easy to separate from the water.

I guess.


50 posted on 03/02/2011 5:17:25 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Minus_The_Bear

That’s one of those tiny hurdles they have to overcome.


51 posted on 03/02/2011 5:24:25 PM PST by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: count-your-change
"Let’s see...The area of New Mexico is about 2000 square miles"

You really ought to check your facts more closely:

http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0108250.html

New Mexico Land area: 121,356 sq mi

2000 square miles is only a rectangle 40 miles by 50 miles, which is a postage stamp compared to most states (except for perhaps Rhode Island). Even Massachusetts is around 8000 square miles.

52 posted on 03/02/2011 5:44:21 PM PST by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog
It looks like you need 3 sq. feet per gallon in land area.

So for my 1000 gallons a year (20 gal per week)I need to allocate 3000 sq feet of land. That works for me.

Now when does their patent run out?
53 posted on 03/02/2011 6:15:10 PM PST by Ron/GA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

If it works, hubba hubba. I’d love to get off the Arab tit.


54 posted on 03/02/2011 6:39:24 PM PST by karnage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

Correct you are! Mea culpa!


55 posted on 03/02/2011 8:09:08 PM PST by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

Correct you are! Mea culpa! For such a mistake I should say it twice....


56 posted on 03/02/2011 8:10:46 PM PST by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
"This sounds way too good to be true. About a gallon of diesel from every three square feet every year?"

Might be, but the science in their peer-reviewed paper doesn't seem to be out of line. I need to spend some time looking at the reference links from that paper.

57 posted on 03/03/2011 5:13:22 AM PST by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

The MMGW thing cast a pall on the credibility of peer review. They used “incestuous peer review” practices that would have gagged any legitimate scientist. They worked it like this.

One would be the “lead researcher” on a paper, with two others acting as “assistants”. Then a fourth member of their group would write the “peer review”. Then they would rotate positions, so that in one cycle of four papers, each of them would be lead once, peer reviewer once, and assistant twice. Then the cycle would start over with the fifth paper.

With tricks like this, the entire MMGW cabal was restricted to a few dozen insiders, some outsiders who believed, but were kept outside the primary group to cheer lead, and any others they could sucker into supporting them.

Truthfully, they didn’t even innovate this corruption of the peer review process. Credit for that goes to the pharma companies, who for years openly hired peer reviewers with the understanding that they would support the science, unless there were some really glaring errors, which they would quietly refer back to the pharma company.


58 posted on 03/03/2011 6:33:21 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
"The MMGW thing cast a pall on the credibility of peer review. They used “incestuous peer review” practices that would have gagged any legitimate scientist. They worked it like this."

Very true, unfortunately, and the blatantness of it as revealed in the "Climategate" emails REALLY p*ssed me off, because what they did hurts all of science and technology research.

And the above is why I plan to spend some time working through the references to the paper. But the details given in the paper itself don't raise any serious alarm bells in my mind based on what I already know about science in general and this topic area in particular. There are no "magic unknowns" that have to be overcome or laws of physics that seem to be contraverted (as in cold fusion).

59 posted on 03/03/2011 6:45:51 AM PST by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: wideminded

Thanks. It IS 20 mbd. My one senior moment for the day.


60 posted on 03/03/2011 7:10:51 AM PST by OregonRancher (Some days, it's not even worth chewing through the restraints)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson