Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pollster1
-- No. It is not acceptable to dodge a valid debt that way ... --

It's not a dodge, it's handing your assets over to a court, and letting the court figure out how to pay your creditors. The creditors aren't getting zero unless the bankruptcy court accepts the case, then says so.

An entity only has so much money. When the money runs out, bankruptcy ensues.

23 posted on 03/02/2011 11:42:02 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt
It's not a dodge, it's handing your assets over to a court, and letting the court figure out how to pay your creditors. The creditors aren't getting zero unless the bankruptcy court accepts the case, then says so. An entity only has so much money. When the money runs out, bankruptcy ensues.

We disagree. If a court compels you to act immorally, that absolves you of any moral responsibility for your actions (maybe). If a court permits you to act immorally, that does not absolve you of the responsibility to act morally. If you cannot pay today, when the court writes off all or part of a valid debt, but you can pay tomorrow or next year, then I would say that there is still a moral obligation to pay off a morally valid debt when you are able to.

29 posted on 03/02/2011 1:58:27 PM PST by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson