[Old Teufel Hunden]

"How can you reject my whole assertion when it was YOU who said the preamble to the Constitution is law?"

Wow, are you really this stupid? Or just this dishonest? You still have not admitted your clear mistake about the first question you asked me. So you are probably just this dishonest. The assertion I reject made by you is that something from the Constitution is only considered law if it has been adjudicated by SCOTUS. That is your assertion and is underlying in the prompting of your question. I answered your original question, yet you have never answered any of mine. So, when you can prove your assertion (that statements in the constitution are only law if they have been adjudicated by SCOTUS), then I'll take the time look up some case law and answer your question.

Is that simple enough for you sea lawyer? Probably not, because you are a dishonest sea lawyer. Proven because you have been shown to make conflicting statements and not even admitted it.

[Thermalseeker]

You sir, are delusional. Rant on, keep on throwing insults all you want. I'm not taking the bait.

Notice how I have not made any attempt to insult you? Your reaction to my simple question is proving beyond a shadow of doubt that you cannot back up your claims.

Now, you are making things up based on your opinion. I don't accept your opinion as a basis for any commentary because you have proven that you do not know what you are talking about.

I ask you one more time, please cite one case where the preamble to the Constitution was cited as law. If you come back with more of this blather about how I'm being dishonest, despite the fact that the previous six posts have all asked the same thing, you have exposed yourself. Again, it's okay to admit you are wrong. It's the noble thing to do at this point. Continuing to attempt to insult me just shows your weak character. Put up, or shut up.