[SvenMagnussen]

Apparently, GA provided a solution to a legally void original BC ...

38 ... “If the foregoing described certified exact copy of the
39 candidate’s first original long-form birth certificate is not attached and the candidate’s
40 affidavit indicates that a first original long-form birth certificate for the candidate does
41 not exist, the candidate shall attach certified exact copies of other original
42 documentation, including, but not limited to, the candidate’s birth records, adoption
43 records, baptism records, Social Security records, medical records, school and college
44 records, military records, and passport records showing, either individually or
45 collectively, that the candidate meets the natural born citizenship, age, and residency
46 requirements prescribed by Article II, Section 1 of the United States Constitution. The
47 candidate shall not attach certified or other copies of nonoriginal documents or records;”

[Crucial]

Georgia isn’t playing around. Let’s hope this passes.

[bitt]

Apparently, GA provided a solution to a legally void original BC ...

38 ... “If the foregoing described certified exact copy of the
39 candidate’s first original long-form birth certificate is not attached and the candidate’s
40 affidavit indicates that a first original long-form birth certificate for the candidate does
41 not exist, the candidate shall attach certified exact copies of other original
42 documentation, including, but not limited to, the candidate’s birth records, adoption
43 records, baptism records, Social Security records, medical records, school and college
44 records, military records, and passport records showing, either individually or
45 collectively, that the candidate meets the natural born citizenship, age, and residency
46 requirements prescribed by Article II, Section 1 of the United States Constitution. The
47 candidate shall not attach certified or other copies of nonoriginal documents or records;”

[Kenny Bunk]

I think I know what a "Natural Born Citizen" is. What must I do to get some legally constituted authority to tell me if I am correct, or not?

If I think someone is holding an office for which he is not qualified under the Constitution, where do I go to find out if I am right, or wrong?

Many citizen disagree with my reasoning. Many agree. Isn't that why we have courts? Why is this issue not being handled by them?