Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OneWingedShark
Let’s say that you did indeed extend a conditional invitation onto your property with the one condition being that I be unarmed; would you then be willing to sign a legally binding contract stating that you are legally and financially responsible for my safety while on your property?

Ah, now you are entering the realm of counter-conditions, which is all well and good in a free society. Would I sign such a agreement? No, but then I never wanted you on my property to begin with. But I infer that you are asking whether it is reasonable for you to ask your employer to sign such a conditional contract, to which I would say, if you think its reasonable then it is defacto reasonable. I say this because I believe that it is you, not anyone else, that decides your conditions, and likewise, your employer, no you, that decides his. Compromise is always a possibility.

The purported contradiction you laid out is based on some heavy and willful parsing of my posts.

87 posted on 03/05/2011 1:20:30 PM PST by SampleMan (If all of the people currently oppressed shared a common geography, bullets would already be flying.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]


To: SampleMan

>The purported contradiction you laid out is based on some heavy and willful parsing of my posts.

They are direct quotes.


88 posted on 03/05/2011 1:28:22 PM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson