Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SampleMan

“’If some nut job’ should never be the employer’s liability.”

Yes it should if the employer makes the nutjob’s actions more likely and more likely to be more lethal. It’s similar to why you don’t let known pedophiles work in daycare centers (except in certain lib states where said pedophile’s rights trump kids’ rights not to be raped by law).


34 posted on 02/28/2011 10:53:31 PM PST by piytar (Obastard is a use of the term "bastard" in the literal sense -- Obama is hiding his daddy's identity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: piytar
No. Why should anyone be responsible for the nutjob? Your problem is that you don't understand the fundamental problem concerning rights and liability.

If people weren't held liable for the actions of nutjobs that they have no control over, then employers wouldn't be incentivized to shield themselves to begin with.

Far too many people think that the problem with government intrusion is that they aren't the one's doing the intruding. They don't recognize that the problem is the intrusion itself, not its intent.

Think about that. Doing what you want without being held accoutable for the actions of others.

46 posted on 03/01/2011 7:42:56 PM PST by SampleMan (If all of the people currently oppressed shared a common geography, bullets would already be flying.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson